PBS Wolf Poll...

[rainshadow1]

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/609/index.html

[BIGINNER]

GLAD TO SEE THAT NO WENT UP 

[boneaddict]

vote cast...comment placed

[Shootmoore]

Bumping this poll.  What I always find interesting in the comments section is the pro-wolf argument is always emotion based.  There was even one fellow that seemed to think that the Federal government should do more to control human population and thought that China had the right idea.  

Shootmoore

[boneaddict]

I wonder how long it takes for comments to appear.  Mine are not on there as of yet.

[WAcoyotehunter]

I wonder how long it takes for comments to appear.  Mine are not on there as of yet.

niether are mine...will have to watch that one for a while.

[WAcoyotehunter]

see ed bangs interview at around 9:20 in the video. 

[mathews_shooter4life]

thanks for spreading the truth about this fleecing of the American public.....

also posted in other forum headings.....


http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,45851.0.html

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,45852.0.html


we need all the help we can get.

[bearpaw]

The problem with pbs, there's always an environmentalist twist to their reporting....

good to see the public response is 68% NO at this point....

[mulehunter]

   I wrote on Commenter. It better be POSTED!  I dont think they will accept my write.   

Mulehunter

[bearpaw]

Just voted again, NO is at 70%     

[ribka]

Voted no 3 x's

[boneaddict]

They still haven't posted my comment.  Wasn't even nasty.  JERKS!

[mulehunter]

They still haven't posted my comment.  Wasn't even nasty.  JERKS!

Mine were NOT even Nasty! Obviouly they are ALL WOLVES SUPPORTIVE group!

Mulehunter 

[mathews_shooter4life]

They still haven't posted my comment.  Wasn't even nasty.  JERKS!

Mine were NOT even Nasty! Obviouly they are ALL WOLVES SUPPORTIVE group!

Mulehunter 

for some reason, didnt post my comment for 2 days....then it was up.....not sure of the problem, but anti hunting people are not letting to many of us speak out on this situation. hopefully pbs will see that we all have a voice that needs to be heard.

[bearhunter99]

At first it looked like there was a healthy balance of comments, but towards the end there isn't anything but bunnyhuggers.  Still haven't seen my comment get posted yet

[Little Dave]

One of the comments did a good job using a metaphor people can understand.  "It's like the govt restoring crabgrass in your lawn."  I'm pretty sure more people understand the effect of crabgrass on their yard.  Strange as it seems, quite a few people that vote don't really have a good picture of where meat comes from.  For them, it's no use talking about matters of biology.

Other comments like the one soliciting assassins, (scalp, shoot, poison people, etc.) an interesting choice for their editor to allow.

[bearpaw]

NO at 70%  - Keep voting.... http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/609/index.html

I posted a reserved comment, will see if it gets added...

[mathews_shooter4life]

I posted up some pretty harsh comments and both got published......don't quite understand why there are not posting up all the comments.

[bearpaw]

mathews what name did you post under?

[rainshadow1]

"Guest" and the rest of the ARA's commit intellectual suicide!

[bearpaw]

I posted a note just a while ago and it is already on there....

Dale - Washington
As a resident in a state where wolves are being brought back I am truly concerned. While I could agree with trying to allow a few wolves on the landscape, it seems the government wants to have too many all at once.

I think we would all be better off to take recovery in small steps and see how wolves fit into our modern ecosystems a few at a time in the southern 48 states. Human safety, Livestock Predation, and potential for Disease Transmission need to carefully considered.

For info about all these important considerations, please check out www.graywolfnews.com and you will learn a lot about what's in the news regarding wolves.