collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: lead vs. copper  (Read 6502 times)

Offline Dirty Mike

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Roy, Wa
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
lead vs. copper
« on: March 26, 2010, 06:09:58 AM »
i dont if im sold on the new copper bullets yet just dont think they mushroom enough at such slow speeds might go back to my dead centers what are your thoughts?

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2010, 06:42:44 AM »
after recovering the Barnes Expander from the whitetail I shot, I won't go back to lead.  Longer bullet that shoots better groups.  Expansion was full and complete, with no loss of weight.  The bullet expanded far better in the animal than it did in the test run when shooting into sand. 

the only option I am now weighing is whether to shoot the 275 grain I shot this year or go to the 325 grain that is a little longer

Offline Whitelightning

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Hey Yogi
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2010, 07:21:48 AM »
I am a beleiver in long conicals out of a Muzzy. I have never not had a lead conical NOT be a complete pass through with tremendous internal damage. I have seen and read of many jacketed bullets remaing within the animal and guy's having to put two bullets in the animal to drop it. I also agree that a longer projectile stabilizes faster and better out of a Muzzy and that makes the projectile heavier and typicaly will hold more energy down range.  :twocents:
Smoke em when ya see em!

Offline Dirty Mike

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Roy, Wa
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2010, 08:04:48 AM »
i was thinking of the barnez tmz any reports?

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2010, 08:07:45 AM »
The expander MZ is the only bullet they make for the .54, so I can't speak to the other styles as my options were limited.

Offline Dirty Mike

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Roy, Wa
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2010, 08:11:22 AM »
any reports on the tmz 290

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2010, 03:35:56 PM »
yes that is what me and my cousin shot are bucks with this year with the tmz 290 they did very well and i we both shot the 340 dead centers for years and i still love those bullets. i think they are about equal, they did shoot well just about the same as my dead centers but of course a little flatter they worked great on the deer we shot and i think i will use them again this year. but i still love my dead centers and never had one problem with them on  all the deer i have shot with them over the years. so my :twocents: is they are about equal. we did not shoot either of our bucks threw any solid bones just rips i am wondering what they will do at 100 yards on solid bone might open up a bit i have shot allot testing on wood jugs etc and they are great but not sure how great at 100 yards+ hope this helps ya
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2010, 03:38:55 PM »
here is the link to my buck from this last year 09,and  the story.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,39198.0.html
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline Dirty Mike

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Roy, Wa
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2010, 12:37:28 PM »
shot the sst yesterday grouped great but did not mushroom hardly at all with both bullets not happy at all

Offline Hilltophustler

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 114
  • Location: Monroe, WA
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2010, 03:10:49 PM »
Just bought me a pack of Barnes TMZ 290 grain :o... Cant wait to shoot them and see how they do....might just have to get some milk jugs together and see what they look like...

Offline Blsum

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 738
  • Location: Shelton Wa
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2010, 03:59:49 PM »
Just bought me a pack of Barnes TMZ 290 grain :o... Cant wait to shoot them and see how they do....might just have to get some milk jugs together and see what they look like...

You dirt bag. Where did you get them from. That place up north. You know. I still have a bunch of milk jugs, and the video camera. When do you think you will be coming down next?
It's not the size of the trophy that make's it a trophy.

You may just be one person in this world. But you may be the world to just one person.

Offline hirshey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2279
  • Location: Central Washington
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2010, 07:25:16 PM »
TMZ has a beautiful mushroom. When I get back home tomorrow I'll take a photo of the two bullets pulled out of our animals this season.
I am not opposed to golf, for I suspect it keeps armies of the unworthy from discovering deer.

Offline hunter guy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 49
  • Location: Pasco
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2010, 07:29:54 PM »
i dont if im sold on the new copper bullets yet just dont think they mushroom enough at such slow speeds might go back to my dead centers what are your thoughts?
I wish I would have taken pics of the entry hole on the deer I harvested this year at around twenty yards with the barnes 290 ballitic tip EZ loader.  The entry hole was as big as the exit hole.  Doubled lunged it and it ran about fifty yards.  Blood was shooting out the entry hole like a sprinkler.  

Here is a barnes 290 and a 300 xtp side by side and the before and after.  The 290 barnes was shot with 100 grains loose and the 300 grain XTP was shot with 80 loose, both saboted out of a .50 cal muzzy.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2010, 07:39:59 PM by hunter guy »

Offline Blsum

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 738
  • Location: Shelton Wa
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2010, 11:27:46 PM »
Here's the picture of the sst bullet from the test I did. I also posted a link to the video of the test.

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,46720.0.html

Here is as close up of a picture I could take with my cell phone. Sorry for the quality. But you can see that the bullet mushroomed and basically just ripped the top half of the bullet  off. I don't think that's quite what I want in a bullet.



As soon as I have time I will take a picture of the Dead center bullet I recovered from my elk.

Here is a barnes 290 and a 300 xtp side by side and the before and after.  The 290 barnes was shot with 100 grains loose and the 300 grain XTP was shot with 80 loose, both saboted out of a .50 cal muzzy.

Hunter guy. What did you recover your bullet's out of? It almost looks like you shot them into sand or dirt of some sorts.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2010, 11:34:52 PM by Blsum »
It's not the size of the trophy that make's it a trophy.

You may just be one person in this world. But you may be the world to just one person.

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #14 on: March 31, 2010, 06:17:04 AM »
I don't think shooting the muzzleloader bullets through water jugs will get them to mushroom, because there isn't enough resistance or drag going through the water.  I think if you want to replicate something closer to going through an animal, you would need balistics gel, or possibly try the poor mans version. stacks of cardboard or phone books I think would give you the result you are looking for. 

The bullets I shot in the sand, did not mushroom well, but retained 100% of their weight.  The ones I shot into the whitetail mushroomed perfectly and still retained 100% of their weight.


Offline hunter guy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 49
  • Location: Pasco
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2010, 07:37:56 AM »

Hunter guy. What did you recover your bullet's out of? It almost looks like you shot them into sand or dirt of some sorts.
[/quote]
These were shot into dirt.

Offline Dirty Mike

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Roy, Wa
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2010, 12:29:16 PM »
the sSt i pulled from a tree did not mushroom looked like the one from the milk jugs

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #17 on: March 31, 2010, 07:03:35 PM »
i have always used milk jugs and they have worked for me. amoung other things 8)
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline Dirty Mike

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 950
  • Location: Roy, Wa
  • Co-founder of Team Dogleg
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #18 on: March 31, 2010, 08:54:31 PM »
milk jugs work great

Offline shag

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 516
  • Location: Cowlitz County WA.
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #19 on: April 03, 2010, 08:05:35 AM »
Get ya some phone books!   I gather enough up to stack in a box with a 20" min length.   just before leaving to go shoot I place them in a cooler and fill it up with water.   Usually set two inches of book(s) in a cardboard box first, then I place a 3/4" piece of plywood and then the rest of the phone books into the box..   Like the plywood as it is sotra like hitting bone then continues through the books.    The books will catch the bullet...   You can also use reduced loads to get an idea how bullet will perform at lower velocitys(farther distance).

The 260rem and 6.5-284 usually penetrate close to 16 inches at 100yds.   I'm into testing ammo for my 260 and -06 right now.  But this summer I plan to test bullets for the muzzy. 
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined,

but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to
maintain a status of independence from any who might
attempt to abuse them, which would include their

own government." -- George Washington

Offline hirshey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2279
  • Location: Central Washington
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #20 on: April 05, 2010, 01:01:17 PM »
Here's some field photos of copper bullets... this one was pulled from where the base of the skull meets the spine on my boyfriend's elk:





You can see that impacting the bone interfered with the mushroom shape.

Same bullet pulled from my elk: through-and-through behind the shoulder lodged in the leg bone on the off side (only bone it encountered)






I am not opposed to golf, for I suspect it keeps armies of the unworthy from discovering deer.

Offline hirshey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2279
  • Location: Central Washington
Re: lead vs. copper
« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2010, 01:05:09 PM »
PS that is the TMZ 290
I am not opposed to golf, for I suspect it keeps armies of the unworthy from discovering deer.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Yesterday at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal