Free: Contests & Raffles.
and a lot of stock 700's out there shoot sub MOA groups... just my and I very well could be wrong...Michael
an average 700 requires work to get reliably under MOA.I wonder what kind of groups you'd really get shooting the barrel it takes to build a 5lb 300wm.
keep in mind a 5lb 300 is gonna lay a pop on you. the recoil force is not bad, bu the velocity is way sharp, so scopes are not likely to last long......been down that road too.
No way the Christiansen in 300 WM will weigh 5.5. It will go closer to the 7 end
Don't believe i would ever want to be behind a 5lb 300WM, sounds like a set of stitches coming on the express lane to me
I have an Rem Alaskan Ti in 300 WM. 7.25 pounds loaded, with the sling, and the ultra light Leupold 3-9 scope. It is a dream to carry. It is pure punishment to shoot her on the range. It has the fluted bolt and barrel and a Titanium receiver. Not sure how you would reduce the weight much beyond that other than modify the stock in some manner.
I've known guys that would spend $1000 to shave 2lbs of a bicycle but still eat junk and gulp beer like there's no tomorrow.
I figure that I have 50 + lbs to give up before I spend a lot to lighten a rifle.
Why spend 4k to build what you can buy for $1500.00Sako Finlight, 300 win mag, 6 13/16lbs, http://www.sako.fi/pdf/specs/85Finnlight.pdfFrom the factory with sub MOA, 5 round group target included, signed by shooter.There are plenty of guns less then 4k that shoot sub MOA.
It was like a bomb to shoot.