collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Another Permit Question  (Read 13212 times)

Offline Fish4Fun

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: Moses Lake
Another Permit Question
« on: April 23, 2010, 12:05:22 PM »
After looking at the new rules and all of the new hunts listed, I am curious if I am thinking correctly. With permits costing 6.50 $ it would it be as follows if a person wanted to go after all of the hunts ?   :dunno:
These are on top of the deer and elk tag to start with

Quality Buck = 6.50
Buck Hunts  =  6.50
2nd Deer     =  6.50
Antlerless    =  6.50

TOTAL  =  26.00 + fees

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39216
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2010, 12:08:26 PM »
Yes, that's what I figured for deer, too.

For elk I will put in for the Quality, Bull, and Antlerless. So that's another $19.50.

For a total of $45.50, just for deer and elk permit applications.

Last year it would have cost about $10 to apply for deer and elk hunts. This year $35 more.   :bash:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2010, 12:10:08 PM »
That is right.  WDFW says there was wide public support for this new system.  I think WDFW ......  :liar:
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline Fish4Fun

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: Moses Lake
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2010, 12:11:30 PM »
Thanks, I figured I was reading it right. After Elk & Deer then toss in the Waterfowl and the permits and stamps for that and I am off to the bank to ask for a loan.   :chuckle:

Offline winston2789

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 467
  • Location: everett
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2010, 12:12:24 PM »
Argeed Curly, Hopefully this pisses off enough people that it goes away next year.  :dunno:

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39216
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2010, 12:15:35 PM »
That's the problem. Now that they've implemented this ridiculous permit system, they CAN'T take it away. People are going to be spending money this year to gain points in all the new categories. So I don't see them just eliminating the categories next year and upsetting even more people than they will with this year's change. Although I believe Dave Ware did say something about they might have to "tweak" it a little next year.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21868
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2010, 12:19:05 PM »
Some (un)lucky souls can apply in six or more deer categories: disabled youth, disabled senior, master hunter senior, master hunter youth.

Also, did you notice how they had to stick at least one hunt into every category?  There is one disabled moose hunt, so the disabled can spend an extra $6.50 to apply.  There is a Sheep Ewe category with one hunt, a Sheep Youth with one, a Sheep Senior with one.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline CoryTDF

  • Make it Rain!!!
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 3184
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Look at me I'm blowing a duck call!
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2010, 12:57:15 PM »
I'm going to be spending $91 this year for my special permits. It would seem that the name of the new game is " $REVENUE$"
CoryTDF

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), British statesman and philosopher

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21868
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2010, 01:04:01 PM »
The purpose was initially to "improve draw odds".  That changed to "increase revenue".  The revenue was to be used to acquire additional land.

I'm going to use the Freedom Of Information act to hound WDFW to give me details of how much revenue they actually received and how it is spent.  I encourge others to do the same.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2010, 01:06:32 PM »
Quote
I'm going to use the Freedom Of Information act to hound WDFW to give me details of how much revenue they actually received and how it is spent.  I encourge others to do the same.

There is no chance that the additional revenue goes into seperate accounts for "land acquisitions"
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39216
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2010, 01:10:07 PM »
Was the money to be used to acquire land, or for private land access? This is what they say on the "Special Permts" page on their website:


Quote
  Department managers are hopeful that these improvements will result in greater customer satisfaction and increase applications for special hunting permits. The additional revenue is intended for use in increasing hunter access to private property 

I think the money will be used to just keep as many employees on as they possibly can.

Offline CoryTDF

  • Make it Rain!!!
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 3184
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Look at me I'm blowing a duck call!
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2010, 01:10:20 PM »
The purpose was initially to "improve draw odds".  That changed to "increase revenue".  The revenue was to be used to acquire additional land.

I'm going to use the Freedom Of Information act to hound WDFW to give me details of how much revenue they actually received and how it is spent.  I encourge others to do the same.

That is a great idea. However, i'm sure you wont like what you find. I wonder how many dinners my $91 is going to buy Mr. Gregoire.
CoryTDF

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing"
- Edmund Burke (1729-1797), British statesman and philosopher

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39216
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2010, 01:14:34 PM »
I feel compelled to throw this quote (lie) in as well, for those who haven't seen it yet:

Quote
This plan was developed with broad public input and the strong support of the Department’s Game Management Advisory Council.


                                     :bs:

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2010, 01:16:19 PM »
Bob, Here is what they are going to tell you at the end of the day.

If we didnt raise the Revenue we were going to have to discontinue our current leases and then there would basically be no access yes program...  The additional funds will actually go to the state general fund and allow WDFW to keep what they have not get there budget cut..
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21868
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Another Permit Question
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2010, 01:17:28 PM »
I'm sure I won't like what I see.  I'm sure they won't like getting hounded for information requests, so there! :IBCOOL:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by Russ McDonald
[Today at 08:33:44 AM]


5 Golden Rings! by AleCapone
[Today at 07:50:08 AM]


Your Idea of the perfect bull elk by chukarchaser
[Today at 06:59:52 AM]


Searing prime rib by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 06:12:21 AM]


Cell Cams for Westside Elk by kodiak06
[Today at 06:01:59 AM]


Perfect 4 by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 10:19:32 PM]


Pack/ backpack to carry a folding long and edc etc.? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:58:37 PM]


Learning his ducks by Pnwrider
[Yesterday at 08:42:33 PM]


How to get big game rules changed? by furbearer365
[Yesterday at 08:35:51 PM]


Darwood Outfitters by bobcat
[Yesterday at 07:25:18 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 02:52:12 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by Ricochet
[Yesterday at 02:48:52 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 12:23:43 PM]


In the background by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 11:59:27 AM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 11:42:03 AM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 10:39:25 AM]


TEN TIPS FOR GREAT FIELD PHOTOS - A strategy for taking quality success photos by KNOPHISH
[Yesterday at 09:00:54 AM]


Tease 'l' by Ricochet
[Yesterday at 08:14:25 AM]


35 whelen by tgray
[Yesterday at 08:13:08 AM]


“Recreational trappers”? by GWP
[Yesterday at 07:36:53 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal