Free: Contests & Raffles.
I'd go '06 unless you are going to consistently expect shots beyond 300 yards. Otherwise no reason for the extra price in ammo or extra recoil.
Not much of a difference between the 7mm Rem Mag. or the 300 Win Mag. both will outperform the 30-06
...i was looking at the marlins.. and savages... mainly something decent to 300 yards...
Personally I would go with the cheaper one of the two and spend the money on a good scope.But I already have a 7mm, 300 wm, and 30-06
yea i still have my 7mm its an interarms rifle... bell and carlson stock (hope thats spelled right) older redfield scope on it... i was thinking about hooking up a buddy with it .. hes gonna need a rifle to hunt with ... his idea to get me back into hunting hehe.. plus miss being out there.. i was looking at the marlins.. and savages... mainly something decent to 300 yards... really appreciate all the input ... im new to the site and have learned tons and tons...
Dude, you should man up and forget the ought six or 300 win.........if you're asking the question you obviously need a 30-378 roy weatherby. In fact you haven't got a hair on your ass unless you at least get an ultra mag........
thats why i shoot .50 BMG
Just stick with the .7mm, as that is a great gun. If it's to hard of a decision keep the .7mm and then pick up both the .30-06 and .300. I have all 3 and I don't think I shoot any of them.