collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Washington Cougar Article  (Read 4688 times)

Offline Cougeyes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 867
Washington Cougar Article
« on: February 27, 2008, 10:09:17 AM »
Here's a link to a good article on cougars and cougar management in Washington and past research conducted within Washington, (i.e. Okanogan, Kettle Falls area, etc..).  I think anyone interested in cougars and management in this state should read it.

http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060040

Offline saylean

  • Team Slayer Packmule
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 8380
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2008, 10:47:34 AM »
An interesting article. Cant say I agree with all points, but there are a few.

One thing they should look into...is not the amount of hunters who have tags...but the amount of hunters who actually harvest a cougar. For example:

"There were a total of 56,651 cougar transport tags acquired for the 2003 cougar season. Cougar hunter success was 0.26 percent statewide."

Total kill...222 statewide. Those are not very good odds.

This was the 2003 harvest report stats.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2008, 11:02:30 AM by saylean »

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2008, 11:29:16 AM »
Also- incidental kills are likely to be smaller, younger cats or females. Hound hunters are likely to let those cats go in search of a big tom.  It makes for more cats as a whole, but a somewhat out of proportion number of adolecensents, that might need an occasional 'tuning' from the adults. 

Offline Cougeyes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 867
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2008, 08:53:48 PM »
I agree with the incidental kills being younger cats or females, but not so sure about the hound hunting.  I agree that hound hunters want a big tom, that is obvious, but then why is it that every year the female quota is filled way before the male quota is met.  The season ends and there are usually a bunch of toms that could have been harvested.  Not up to par on it, but might just be because the boot hunting incorporates into that female component quota.  Who knows, I bet we see some changes this next season with cougar hunting.

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18927
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2008, 08:03:07 AM »
In Stevens/Pend Oreille the female quota was 15.  When the hound season opened 1 Dec there were only 8 females still available for harvest.  Also during the season I believe it was 1 or 2 females were illegally harvested by boot hunters.  So hound hunters ended up taking 6 or 7 females.  I think as the female numbers near the 15 animal mark, the hound hunters get nervous that they will not have a chance to fill their tag so they go ahead and harvest whatever they tree. 
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline HoundGirl

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 5
  • Location: Stilly Valley
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #5 on: February 29, 2008, 01:22:26 PM »
I think letting hound hunter's hunt and not making the tags part of the big game package would be the smartest thing to do. Hound hunter's really do only want large toms. They are not out to kill anything they tree they want something to return to next year to hunt. As for the permits that are issued now, I did draw a west side permit this year. In most units there are 2 permits issued but only one tag given out. Which makes you want to kill the first cat you tree so the other permity doesn't get one first. If they are going to keep the special hunts they need to rethink the way they do them. If you weren't worried about killing one first you could wait for that big tom.

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3022
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #6 on: February 29, 2008, 06:21:00 PM »
thanks for the post, it was an interesting article

to me the whole female quota being meet to fast hasnt been much of an problem, cant say that for all areas but in stevens/pend it was fine. we hunted all the way till jan first and there was 2 females left and 5 overall.

alot of my family is over in idaho right now running lions, wish i was with them :bash:

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 18927
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #7 on: February 29, 2008, 10:08:49 PM »
Pretty sure there was still 18 or 19 toms left when the female quota was met in Stevens/Pend.
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline gramps

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 795
  • Location: SE Wa.
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2008, 01:25:47 PM »
I would like to read the article, but the print is so small I can't read it...it is just a blur.  Can anyone help me with the font size?   I assume it is my computer and can't remember how to change it.   Thanks
It never changes, but it is always different.

Offline Cougeyes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 867
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2008, 02:21:43 PM »
I think you have to go into the start menu, control panel, and display and find somewhere in there that has font size.  Or possibly try to copy and paste into word and change the size in there, but i think that will just screw up the formatting. 

Offline smdave

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 1560
  • Location: WA
    • My Photobooth
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #10 on: March 01, 2008, 02:27:26 PM »
I would like to read the article, but the print is so small I can't read it...it is just a blur.  Can anyone help me with the font size?   I assume it is my computer and can't remember how to change it.   Thanks

You could always download the article to your computer, click on the link on the right hand side you have the download options I clicked on .PDF small and was able to print it out fine.

Dave
« Last Edit: March 01, 2008, 03:44:08 PM by smdave »
When I pass, do not let my wife sell the guns for what I told her they cost.

Offline gramps

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 795
  • Location: SE Wa.
Re: Washington Cougar Article
« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2008, 03:37:06 PM »
Thanks..I got it to download.  I could just barely see the word 'download', but the line next to it was maybe a 1/64 inch high....strange.
It never changes, but it is always different.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Survey in ? by metlhead
[Today at 11:56:54 AM]


Vantage Bridge by dwils233
[Today at 11:46:16 AM]


Nevada Results by mp.hunter
[Today at 11:20:53 AM]


Is FS70 open? by yajsab
[Today at 10:13:07 AM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 09:13:42 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by SLAYRIDE
[Today at 08:54:48 AM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by Angry Perch
[Today at 08:17:37 AM]


F250 or Silverado 2500? by Angry Perch
[Today at 07:38:25 AM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:38:59 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Jpmiller
[Yesterday at 09:28:01 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by jamesjett
[Yesterday at 06:53:04 PM]


Antlerless Moose more than once? by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 06:35:51 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal