Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
second amentment
Advertisement
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: second amentment (Read 17131 times)
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
second amentment
«
on:
February 28, 2008, 06:45:26 PM »
ok heres the thing who cares who wins im 57 now heard it all now if we lose that second amentment this spring we lose everything
Logged
Advertise Here
ICEMAN
Site Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15575
Location: Olympia
The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #1 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:26:59 PM »
WTF?
Can you explain a bit, I am sort of slow...
Logged
molṑn labé
A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head
Kill your television....do it now.....
Don't make me hurt you.
“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.” John Wayne
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #2 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:34:05 PM »
ok if they say the second amentment is or secured to bere our right to have guns
Logged
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #3 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:36:00 PM »
opps cant spell lol bear arms
Logged
Ray
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6817
Location: Kirkland,WA
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #4 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:36:28 PM »
supreme court ruling wa d.c.
Logged
ICEMAN
Site Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15575
Location: Olympia
The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #5 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:36:43 PM »
Ok, now I understand.
Logged
molṑn labé
A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head
Kill your television....do it now.....
Don't make me hurt you.
“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.” John Wayne
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #6 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:45:51 PM »
Good issue... Great point...
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #7 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:54:10 PM »
pop u r just a young person i did not see it my self untel the DC area was non gun but guess how high the crime has been
Logged
MikeWalking
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4667
Location: Woodinville
Patches Pal
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #8 on:
February 29, 2008, 08:14:02 AM »
DC biggest gun free zone----DC highest crime rate.
Suppose there's a connection
Logged
sisu
Guest
Just got this from McMorris
«
Reply #9 on:
March 07, 2008, 01:21:43 PM »
Dear Scott,
I wanted to take a moment to share with you the recent decision made by the U.S. Appeals Court in regard to the Washington, D.C. handgun ban. Using the Second Amendment as support, the court voted 2-1 to overturn the handgun ban as unconstitutional and allow for the individual possession of handguns in the District of Columbia.
Citing the Second Amendment the majority ruled that the right to bear arms is not restricted solely to militia or military bodies, but rather was intended to be an individual statute. The decision to overturn the ban rejects a law that was passed nearly 30 years ago in D.C. as an anti-crime measure. In response to an appeal of this decision by the appeals court, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of District of Columbia v. Heller.
I felt that this case was an important battle for gun owners and I, along with 249 other members of the House of Representatives and 55 members of the Senate, signed an Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the United States Supreme Court urging them to overturn the gun ban. A copy of this brief can be located at this website:
www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/07_290bcongress_amicus_heller.pdf
.
This ruling by the appeals court is an enormous step forward for gun owners and proponents of Second Amendment rights. I look forward to seeing the outcome of this case at the Supreme Court level and the impact this will have on gun ownership across the country. If you have any further questions on this issue or other issues, please visit my website at
www.mcmorris.house.gov
.
Logged
WAcoyotehunter
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
+5
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4457
Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #10 on:
March 07, 2008, 01:32:44 PM »
See video. I like this lady.
Logged
Head-shot
General Underachiever
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1634
Location: Colfax
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #11 on:
March 07, 2008, 10:31:53 PM »
Wow she really puts it into perspective for them.
Logged
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or destroy it, piss on it and walk away!
Bofire
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+5
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5524
Location: Yelm
Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #12 on:
March 18, 2008, 09:57:36 AM »
The arguments start today. Some of the quotes sound pretty good for us. Decision by July I think they said.\
I predict a half-assed response, something like, the 2nd. amendment stands but may be interpreted locally or other nonsense.
I cant see any of the Justices really standing up.
Carl
Logged
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!
I do not shop at Amazon
kramman
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1358
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #13 on:
March 18, 2008, 10:40:21 AM »
the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.what part of that is open to interpetation
Logged
EMPyre
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Scout
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 283
Location: Mount Vernon, Wa
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #14 on:
April 13, 2008, 05:39:43 PM »
Kramman, while I agree whole heartedly with your position, and in fact do beleive that the directness of the statement is clear in its meaning, it is in fact open to interpretation, and here's why.
The exact wording of the second amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The problem is the legal interpretation of the comma that appears after the word 'Arms'. What is being interpreted is the implied meaning of that comma by those opposed to private fire arms ownership is this: The government has the right to arm a militia to protect the government AND the citizenry. The argument here is that the security of a free State shall not be infringed and not directly the right to own fire arms.
If that comma were not there, (and in fact in some original drafts of the bill of rights it does not) then the meaning would be much better clairfied. It would then in fact explicitly allow for the citizens to 'keep and bear arms'. What we need to hope is that the Supreme Court will actually grow a pair this summer and deliver a verdict that defines the second amendment correctly and clearly as we all know and understand it to mean.
Logged
Erich with an H
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
second amentment
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt
by
RB
[
Today
at 09:44:39 PM]
Archery elk gear, 2025.
by
WapitiTalk1
[
Today
at 09:41:28 PM]
Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle
by
pickardjw
[
Today
at 09:11:06 PM]
Utah cow elk hunt
by
bearpaw
[
Today
at 07:18:51 PM]
Oregon spring bear
by
kodiak06
[
Today
at 04:40:38 PM]
Tree stand for Western Washingtn
by
kodiak06
[
Today
at 04:37:01 PM]
Pocket Carry
by
BKMFR
[
Today
at 03:34:12 PM]
A lonely Job...
by
Loup Loup
[
Today
at 01:15:11 PM]
Range finders & Angle Compensation
by
Fidelk
[
Today
at 11:58:48 AM]
Willapa Hills 1 Bear
by
hunter399
[
Today
at 10:55:29 AM]
Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale
by
bearpaw
[
Today
at 08:40:03 AM]
KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Today
at 07:53:52 AM]
Yard bucks
by
Boss .300 winmag
[
Yesterday
at 11:20:39 PM]
Yard babies
by
Feathernfurr
[
Yesterday
at 10:04:54 PM]
Seeking recommendations on a new scope
by
coachg
[
Yesterday
at 08:10:21 PM]
Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips
by
high_hunter
[
Yesterday
at 08:06:05 PM]
Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag
by
HntnFsh
[
Yesterday
at 07:58:22 PM]
MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale
by
Bob33
[
Yesterday
at 06:57:10 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal