Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
second amentment
Advertisement
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: second amentment (Read 17790 times)
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
second amentment
«
on:
February 28, 2008, 06:45:26 PM »
ok heres the thing who cares who wins im 57 now heard it all now if we lose that second amentment this spring we lose everything
Logged
Advertise Here
ICEMAN
Site Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15575
Location: Olympia
The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #1 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:26:59 PM »
WTF?
Can you explain a bit, I am sort of slow...
Logged
molṑn labé
A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head
Kill your television....do it now.....
Don't make me hurt you.
“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.” John Wayne
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #2 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:34:05 PM »
ok if they say the second amentment is or secured to bere our right to have guns
Logged
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #3 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:36:00 PM »
opps cant spell lol bear arms
Logged
Ray
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6817
Location: Kirkland,WA
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #4 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:36:28 PM »
supreme court ruling wa d.c.
Logged
ICEMAN
Site Sponsor
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15575
Location: Olympia
The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #5 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:36:43 PM »
Ok, now I understand.
Logged
molṑn labé
A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head
Kill your television....do it now.....
Don't make me hurt you.
“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.” John Wayne
popeshawnpaul
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3583
Location: Bellevue, WA
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #6 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:45:51 PM »
Good issue... Great point...
Logged
www.WSBowhunters.com
www.shawnmccully.com
gene
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Tracker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 72
Location: spokane
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #7 on:
February 28, 2008, 07:54:10 PM »
pop u r just a young person i did not see it my self untel the DC area was non gun but guess how high the crime has been
Logged
MikeWalking
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4667
Location: Woodinville
Patches Pal
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #8 on:
February 29, 2008, 08:14:02 AM »
DC biggest gun free zone----DC highest crime rate.
Suppose there's a connection
Logged
sisu
Guest
Just got this from McMorris
«
Reply #9 on:
March 07, 2008, 01:21:43 PM »
Dear Scott,
I wanted to take a moment to share with you the recent decision made by the U.S. Appeals Court in regard to the Washington, D.C. handgun ban. Using the Second Amendment as support, the court voted 2-1 to overturn the handgun ban as unconstitutional and allow for the individual possession of handguns in the District of Columbia.
Citing the Second Amendment the majority ruled that the right to bear arms is not restricted solely to militia or military bodies, but rather was intended to be an individual statute. The decision to overturn the ban rejects a law that was passed nearly 30 years ago in D.C. as an anti-crime measure. In response to an appeal of this decision by the appeals court, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of District of Columbia v. Heller.
I felt that this case was an important battle for gun owners and I, along with 249 other members of the House of Representatives and 55 members of the Senate, signed an Amicus Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the United States Supreme Court urging them to overturn the gun ban. A copy of this brief can be located at this website:
www.nraila.org/media/PDFs/07_290bcongress_amicus_heller.pdf
.
This ruling by the appeals court is an enormous step forward for gun owners and proponents of Second Amendment rights. I look forward to seeing the outcome of this case at the Supreme Court level and the impact this will have on gun ownership across the country. If you have any further questions on this issue or other issues, please visit my website at
www.mcmorris.house.gov
.
Logged
WAcoyotehunter
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
+5
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4457
Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #10 on:
March 07, 2008, 01:32:44 PM »
See video. I like this lady.
Logged
Head-shot
General Underachiever
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1634
Location: Colfax
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #11 on:
March 07, 2008, 10:31:53 PM »
Wow she really puts it into perspective for them.
Logged
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or destroy it, piss on it and walk away!
Bofire
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+5
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5524
Location: Yelm
Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #12 on:
March 18, 2008, 09:57:36 AM »
The arguments start today. Some of the quotes sound pretty good for us. Decision by July I think they said.\
I predict a half-assed response, something like, the 2nd. amendment stands but may be interpreted locally or other nonsense.
I cant see any of the Justices really standing up.
Carl
Logged
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!
I do not shop at Amazon
kramman
Political & Covid-19 Topics
Trade Count:
(
+1
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1379
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #13 on:
March 18, 2008, 10:40:21 AM »
the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.what part of that is open to interpetation
Logged
EMPyre
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Scout
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 283
Location: Mount Vernon, Wa
Re: second amentment
«
Reply #14 on:
April 13, 2008, 05:39:43 PM »
Kramman, while I agree whole heartedly with your position, and in fact do beleive that the directness of the statement is clear in its meaning, it is in fact open to interpretation, and here's why.
The exact wording of the second amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The problem is the legal interpretation of the comma that appears after the word 'Arms'. What is being interpreted is the implied meaning of that comma by those opposed to private fire arms ownership is this: The government has the right to arm a militia to protect the government AND the citizenry. The argument here is that the security of a free State shall not be infringed and not directly the right to own fire arms.
If that comma were not there, (and in fact in some original drafts of the bill of rights it does not) then the meaning would be much better clairfied. It would then in fact explicitly allow for the citizens to 'keep and bear arms'. What we need to hope is that the Supreme Court will actually grow a pair this summer and deliver a verdict that defines the second amendment correctly and clearly as we all know and understand it to mean.
Logged
Erich with an H
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Advocacy, Agencies, Access
»
second amentment
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
2025 blacktail rut thread
by
Rigby416
[
Today
at 10:44:37 PM]
Any buck clarification
by
Tball77
[
Today
at 09:37:57 PM]
More special privileges
by
Tbar
[
Today
at 08:06:23 PM]
WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind
by
RC
[
Today
at 07:28:50 PM]
Pearygin Quality
by
Schmalzfam
[
Today
at 06:38:57 PM]
Fishing the East Cape in Baja?
by
Elkman
[
Today
at 06:28:54 PM]
Hunting by Republic/Ferry county
by
Jimmer
[
Today
at 06:00:16 PM]
The Mysterious $200,000
by
Caseyd
[
Today
at 12:10:37 PM]
Grizzly?
by
The Gobble-stopper
[
Today
at 11:20:01 AM]
mushroom id on a hemlock
by
The Gobble-stopper
[
Today
at 11:10:47 AM]
Making memories
by
pashok23
[
Today
at 10:40:31 AM]
Meet Kumpel
by
metlhead
[
Today
at 09:55:26 AM]
AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady
by
ASHQUACK
[
Today
at 08:28:35 AM]
MT general tag filled
by
Wingin it
[
Today
at 08:22:45 AM]
Any success Pearrygin / Chewuch Quality hunters?
by
davew
[
Today
at 06:57:32 AM]
What do I need for elk?
by
Kingofthemountain83
[
Yesterday
at 09:20:10 PM]
As He Lay
by
highside74
[
Yesterday
at 08:31:17 PM]
2025 deer, let's see em!
by
highside74
[
Yesterday
at 08:15:10 PM]
Idaho Unit 39 wolves
by
andrew_in_idaho
[
Yesterday
at 06:19:48 PM]
LINCOLN !!
by
nwwanderer
[
Yesterday
at 05:11:26 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal