Free: Contests & Raffles.
Nobody should pay to hunt private property. The WDFW should not issue tags where a landowner is going to charge Hunters who pay for a Hunting license. Let the Landowner resolve thier own overpopulation of bears but if they break the law by harvesting more than the license they hold they should be accountable.
whoa! easy there Tex...I have put in for units in Montana that I have never stepped foot on. who gives a chite, really? There is nothing that says you have to give info to these people, so guess what? DON'T REPLY![/quoWAYread this Tex, then read it again
someone sounds mad they didnt draw what they wanted
Quote from: alanger on June 29, 2010, 03:40:45 PMsomeone sounds mad they didnt draw what they wanted Nope. I drew two tags, both were my first choices
For example "C" means lots of private land. My hunt choices didn't show any hunt notes. I ended up drawing Ritaville (Unit 284) late archery. After doing a bit more research, it seems like the entire unit is private property. I wish I'd done a little more digging before applying, but I'm not going to feel bad when I ask for some assistance from people on this site. Should I?
Quote from: huntndad on June 30, 2010, 10:28:26 AMFor example "C" means lots of private land. My hunt choices didn't show any hunt notes. I ended up drawing Ritaville (Unit 284) late archery. After doing a bit more research, it seems like the entire unit is private property. I wish I'd done a little more digging before applying, but I'm not going to feel bad when I ask for some assistance from people on this site. Should I?Well there is actually a lot of BLM land on the eastern half of the GMU. There is also a TON of land available to hunters under the Hunting by Written Permission Program in this GMU. Getting this info took me less then 5 minutes on the WDFW website....