collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .270 vs 338  (Read 20180 times)

Offline 300UltraMagShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1408
.270 vs 338
« on: September 19, 2010, 09:11:08 PM »

which one and why?
just curious about responses.... i have zero clue at this point.

Offline 1bugman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 856
  • Location: Cle Elum
  • All good things come to those who shoot strait.
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2010, 09:14:33 PM »
Depends on what you want to hunt with it. I do most of my hunting with my 270. Killed a lot a deer. Just bought a 300 win mag. for elk. do know much about the 338,but it maybe a little over kill for Deer.

Offline wsucowboy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 3219
  • Location: Tieton
  • Groups: NRA, RMEF
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2010, 09:17:40 PM »
my dad has killed alot of deer with his 338 and it's not over kill. It's over kill when he shoots coyotes in the pasture with it but it's fine on deer.
"A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that."
-Alan Ladd
"Courage is fear that has said its prayers."
-Karl Barth

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31527
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2010, 09:32:30 PM »
more details needed :chuckle:

what are you hunting?
how far are you wanting to shoot?
does ammo price matter?
do you handload?
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline 300UltraMagShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1408
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2010, 09:41:08 PM »

no, don't hand load.

obviously i shoot a 300 rum.... and i love how accurate it is with factor ammo.

I got it cause I wanted to have a gun to hunt anything and everything with.  Just one gun.

I'm simply trying to figure out if I could not have done the same thing with something smaller.

i figured I'd go on the light side and on the upper and lower end of the spectrum to see if I could get some opinions.

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2010, 09:47:42 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_D.M._Bell

Bell shot over 1500 elephants during his career. He was noted for using high speed, smaller calibre bullets[7] rather than than the bigger slower calibres that were popular with other big game hunters[8]. Over a thousand of these kills were made with English manufactured copies of German Mauser rifles in 7x57mm calibre. A further 300 were killed with Mannlicher-Schoenauer 6.5x54mm[9] carbines, and another 200 with a .303 British[10]. He insisted on using military Full Metal Jacket bullets weighing from approx 150 to 200 grains, rather than the 400+ grain bullets popular at the time[11] Bell refused to use soft point bullets under any circumstances.

Shot placement is what it's all about, I would take the .270 out of those two.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

Tony 270

  • Guest
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2010, 09:55:13 PM »

which one and why?
just curious about responses.... i have zero clue at this point.

For what game and what ranges?

Offline shedcrazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 732
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2010, 10:01:51 PM »
I use both, they are my big game rifles. You can never kill them to dead. i love em both!!

Tony 270

  • Guest
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2010, 10:06:15 PM »
I'd say if you already have a 300 ultra then go down to a 270. Really not going to gain anything by using a 338 on top of what you already have. But the 270 can be used well in addition to it, without overlapping.

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2010, 10:26:23 PM »
I'd say if you already have a 300 ultra then go down to a 270. Really not going to gain anything by using a 338 on top of what you already have. But the 270 can be used well in addition to it, without overlapping.

:yeah:  You definitely won't gain anything by going to a 338, over a 300 Ultra Mag. But if you get a 270 you'll have a rifle that you actually might enjoy shooting more than that Ultra Mag, and it's probably going to be quite a bit lighter and easier to carry all day while hunting.

Offline Skinnyman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 145
  • Location: Steilacoom
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2010, 10:59:52 PM »
Do you have to pick?? Two totally different guns, each having its own benefits. I personally have a 338 WM and love it, dont have a 270. But the recoil on the 338 WM for some might be a little stiff, although it doesn't bother me. Also, if you dont reload, 338 WM factory ammo is A LOT more expensive than 270 factory ammo. And at the range, you can put more 270 rounds downrange before your shoulder craps out.

If I had both guns, I would choose a 270 for deer and smaller, and a 338 for everything bigger. But I only have a 338, and I dont think a 338 is too big for deer (is there such a thing as too much gun, or too dead of an animal).


Offline Gutpile

  • Gaseous horribulous stinkusis
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 4478
  • Location: Spokane Valley
    • https://www.facebook.com/mark.farrell.142?ref=tn_tnmn
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2010, 06:07:07 AM »
Talk about comparing apples and oranges.

Y.A.R. Gold Member

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10931
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2010, 06:36:26 AM »
I sure dont like hurting, so I shoot something that is friendly to the shoulder. I shoot ether a .270win (most of the time) or a 30-06. Never felt under gunned. Made good shots at 300 ish yards with both. Deer fall over dead!
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline 1bugman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 856
  • Location: Cle Elum
  • All good things come to those who shoot strait.
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2010, 07:25:38 AM »
If I had both guns, I would choose a 270 for deer and smaller, and a 338 for everything bigger. But I only have a 338, and I dont think a 338 is too big for deer (is there such a thing as too much gun, or too dead of an animal)

Yes, There is such a thing as over kill. I've seen some deer shot ,once in the shoulder, with 30-06's that where only good for burger, and noting else. The only time I've had that happen with my .270, I shot the poor thing 5 times thinking I was missing. and not wanting it to go dawn that steep hill.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2010, 08:09:23 AM by bobcat »

Online bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: .270 vs 338
« Reply #14 on: September 20, 2010, 07:33:38 AM »
Yes, There is such a thing as over kill. I've seen some deer shot ,once in the shoulder, with 30-06's that where only good for burger, and noting else. The only time I've had that happen with my .270, I shot the poor thing 5 times thinking I was missing. and not wanting it to go dawn that steep hill.

A 30-06 will do no more damage to meat than a 270. They are virtually the same as far as that aspect goes. It's the type of bullet used that really makes a difference.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hoof Rot by bobcat
[Today at 03:04:04 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by hunter399
[Today at 02:54:38 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by CP
[Today at 01:36:59 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 12:01:17 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by GWP
[Today at 11:29:07 AM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:12:50 AM]


Oregon special tag info by JakeLand
[Today at 10:27:35 AM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:38:55 AM]


Get ready for the 4th of July by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:36:56 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 09:15:32 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:09:55 AM]


Idaho Mt goat draft plan by time2hunt
[Today at 07:59:04 AM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:52:17 AM]


Disabled Fishing License by Blacklab
[Today at 07:44:43 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by jackelope
[Today at 07:18:59 AM]


Missoula Fishing by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:30:10 PM]


Buck age by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:08:41 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:55:37 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:36:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 07:28:59 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal