collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2  (Read 7489 times)

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2008, 06:30:48 AM »
My 3 year old Rem is a sub MOA out of the box, factory ammo. Love my Remington.

I dont know....flip a coin?  :dunno:
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline thinkingman

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2008, 03:29:22 PM »
I would go with Weatherby.
Longer barrel, better resale and less likely to get a lemon.
I have heard forever how the 700 action is the basis for this and that but I feel QC at Remington is alot more likely to let a turd slip thru and don't want to be the one to find it.
When I was shopping for a 7mm-08, I wanted a Rem LSS in the worst way but bought a Tikka instead for the reasons posted above and don't regret it.
Rem trigger will need work too, even if the barrel/action is spot on.
come to think of it, why not a S/SS Tikka 7MM magnum?
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell

Offline FOsteology

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 171
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2008, 04:40:52 PM »
thats what i planned on doing with the remington if i get it. im looking to get my new rifle as light as possible. i do alot of hiking when hunting and i just need a light wieght rifle.

Another option for light weight is the 84M Kimber Montana. The .308Win or .338 Federal would be an ideal mountain rifle and weigh in 5lbs (+/- a couple ounces) sans scope and rings.

I went this route with a .338 Federal and mine weighs in under 6lbs all up.


Offline littletoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 885
  • Location: NE Part of Worshing-ton,
  • old fart
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2008, 04:59:31 PM »
Thinkingman-Don't know....I kinda feel Remington is busting butt to keep shooters happy. Look at all the new things they are doing, and I'm not just saying this because I'm a Remmy Man.
Just go to their website and order a new catalog. 
"The People of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline MountainWalk

  • "Pa Nevermissashot"
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 3083
  • Location: Afognak, POW, Kodiak, Quilcene
  • High lead logger/ cutter
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2008, 05:03:17 PM »
im fine with remington. i just wish they would lay off the thumbhole stocks.. how ugly
The way that you wander, is the way that you choose
The day that you tarry, is the day that you lose

Offline bankwalker

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2515
  • Location: Matlock
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2008, 05:29:32 PM »
thats what i planned on doing with the remington if i get it. im looking to get my new rifle as light as possible. i do alot of hiking when hunting and i just need a light wieght rifle.

Another option for light weight is the 84M Kimber Montana. The .308Win or .338 Federal would be an ideal mountain rifle and weigh in 5lbs (+/- a couple ounces) sans scope and rings.

I went this route with a .338 Federal and mine weighs in under 6lbs all up.



lol how funny. i just actually looked those up last night. and im ordering one next week.

its got everything i need and am looking for.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lion Down - the Savor of Success by cedarriver
[Today at 01:52:30 PM]


Leopard Cur Pups by teanawayslayer
[Today at 11:05:27 AM]


Swakane by Rainier10
[Today at 10:44:13 AM]


Smelt ? by Trapper John
[Today at 10:41:03 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Dan-o
[Today at 10:26:27 AM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Today at 10:06:23 AM]


Crazy looking Deer by Ironhead
[Today at 09:52:41 AM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:57:21 AM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by DaNewb
[Today at 08:01:54 AM]


Long Range Steel Choke by Elmer Fletch
[Today at 06:10:11 AM]


West side antler buyers by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:19:05 PM]


Is it a conflict of interest by bbarnes
[Yesterday at 08:54:11 PM]


Shotgun Sight help by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 08:38:11 PM]


Found after 2 days, meat worth anything? by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 07:58:12 PM]


6x51R by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:22:48 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by swordtine
[Yesterday at 07:20:45 PM]


Reinforcing stock for bipod by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 03:36:10 PM]


Seekins SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 01:42:40 PM]


Big J's Barn sale / Drawing by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 01:37:21 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal