collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2  (Read 7365 times)

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2008, 06:30:48 AM »
My 3 year old Rem is a sub MOA out of the box, factory ammo. Love my Remington.

I dont know....flip a coin?  :dunno:
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline thinkingman

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2008, 03:29:22 PM »
I would go with Weatherby.
Longer barrel, better resale and less likely to get a lemon.
I have heard forever how the 700 action is the basis for this and that but I feel QC at Remington is alot more likely to let a turd slip thru and don't want to be the one to find it.
When I was shopping for a 7mm-08, I wanted a Rem LSS in the worst way but bought a Tikka instead for the reasons posted above and don't regret it.
Rem trigger will need work too, even if the barrel/action is spot on.
come to think of it, why not a S/SS Tikka 7MM magnum?
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell

Offline FOsteology

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 171
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2008, 04:40:52 PM »
thats what i planned on doing with the remington if i get it. im looking to get my new rifle as light as possible. i do alot of hiking when hunting and i just need a light wieght rifle.

Another option for light weight is the 84M Kimber Montana. The .308Win or .338 Federal would be an ideal mountain rifle and weigh in 5lbs (+/- a couple ounces) sans scope and rings.

I went this route with a .338 Federal and mine weighs in under 6lbs all up.


Offline littletoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 885
  • Location: NE Part of Worshing-ton,
  • old fart
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2008, 04:59:31 PM »
Thinkingman-Don't know....I kinda feel Remington is busting butt to keep shooters happy. Look at all the new things they are doing, and I'm not just saying this because I'm a Remmy Man.
Just go to their website and order a new catalog. 
"The People of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline MountainWalk

  • "Pa Nevermissashot"
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 3083
  • Location: Afognak, POW, Kodiak, Quilcene
  • High lead logger/ cutter
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2008, 05:03:17 PM »
im fine with remington. i just wish they would lay off the thumbhole stocks.. how ugly
The way that you wander, is the way that you choose
The day that you tarry, is the day that you lose

Offline bankwalker

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2515
  • Location: Matlock
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2008, 05:29:32 PM »
thats what i planned on doing with the remington if i get it. im looking to get my new rifle as light as possible. i do alot of hiking when hunting and i just need a light wieght rifle.

Another option for light weight is the 84M Kimber Montana. The .308Win or .338 Federal would be an ideal mountain rifle and weigh in 5lbs (+/- a couple ounces) sans scope and rings.

I went this route with a .338 Federal and mine weighs in under 6lbs all up.



lol how funny. i just actually looked those up last night. and im ordering one next week.

its got everything i need and am looking for.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Colville lodging, any recommendations? by Dark2Dark
[Today at 11:12:14 AM]


Harlequin in weird places? by hunterednate
[Today at 11:03:47 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by ballpark
[Today at 10:11:42 AM]


GMU 335/334 cow tag help by nicz
[Today at 09:48:49 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Oldguy
[Today at 09:31:54 AM]


The 33 year quest by HikerHunter
[Today at 08:25:05 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by throttlejocky20
[Today at 08:12:25 AM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by Goshawk
[Today at 07:58:06 AM]


A great stormy weekend for bucks, now don't forget to... by Goshawk
[Today at 07:56:19 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by HighlandLofts
[Today at 07:32:31 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by 300rum
[Today at 07:23:58 AM]


Letter of Complaint to WDFW/CWD by HereDuckyDucky
[Today at 07:13:21 AM]


Another Mushroom we need ID on by Southpole
[Today at 07:02:54 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by JDArms1240
[Today at 07:02:38 AM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by spin05
[Yesterday at 11:41:02 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 11:23:07 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:28:08 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 09:01:20 PM]


Mushroom ID by jrebel
[Yesterday at 07:57:13 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Booner
[Yesterday at 07:03:22 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal