.

[jackelope]

I'd be surprised if he was 170. I say  165 but the difference between 165 and 175 is so minimal I'd be hard pressed to tell the difference.
I think he's 25-26 wide.

[jackelope]

His mains split after his ears, those deep 16 inch middle forks... he could go 176. Nice buck thanks for sharing.

What are deep 16" middle forks?

[SkookumHntr]

-After seeing that front pic he may not be 28 but is wider then 25, 26-27" range my guess.

[Hornseeker]

I say he grosses 172....

[Buckjunkie]

I agree..Low to mid 170's.  That last frontal shot makes him look a little smaller though.  I started doubting my numbers. 

24" Mains
2" G1's
16" G2's
9" G3 on one side 6-7" on the other
11" G4's

20" inside spread ? maybe 21-22
32" of mass

 

[rosscrazyelk]

Big enough.

[coachcw]

great willpower. 170 would be my guess still a pretty young buck.

[agchawk]

 Although I have never been great at these sorts of things, I think I'm on the lower end of the "guessing spectrum." I'd say he'd net around 160-165.

 But that doesn't really matter cause I would not hesitate to drop him.

[Pathfinder101]

160's.  He's a great buck.  Unless you've already got a 200" buck hanging on your wall, he'll look big.  Hell, even if you have a 200" buck on your wall, he'll STILL look big...

[ducks55]

174

[boneaddict]

If my first view would have been from behind, he'd be dead.   He loses a bit when he turns around.  Pushing 170

[alanger]

according to the tale of the tape: SHOOT and 7/8" wow what a score. 

[CountryslickR]

161 ...lol...hard to tell, but they always look bigger from behind...the frontal shot puts it in better perspective!