collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2  (Read 7626 times)

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2008, 06:30:48 AM »
My 3 year old Rem is a sub MOA out of the box, factory ammo. Love my Remington.

I dont know....flip a coin?  :dunno:
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline thinkingman

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 2335
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #16 on: April 16, 2008, 03:29:22 PM »
I would go with Weatherby.
Longer barrel, better resale and less likely to get a lemon.
I have heard forever how the 700 action is the basis for this and that but I feel QC at Remington is alot more likely to let a turd slip thru and don't want to be the one to find it.
When I was shopping for a 7mm-08, I wanted a Rem LSS in the worst way but bought a Tikka instead for the reasons posted above and don't regret it.
Rem trigger will need work too, even if the barrel/action is spot on.
come to think of it, why not a S/SS Tikka 7MM magnum?
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell

Offline FOsteology

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 171
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2008, 04:40:52 PM »
thats what i planned on doing with the remington if i get it. im looking to get my new rifle as light as possible. i do alot of hiking when hunting and i just need a light wieght rifle.

Another option for light weight is the 84M Kimber Montana. The .308Win or .338 Federal would be an ideal mountain rifle and weigh in 5lbs (+/- a couple ounces) sans scope and rings.

I went this route with a .338 Federal and mine weighs in under 6lbs all up.


Offline littletoes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 885
  • Location: NE Part of Worshing-ton,
  • old fart
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2008, 04:59:31 PM »
Thinkingman-Don't know....I kinda feel Remington is busting butt to keep shooters happy. Look at all the new things they are doing, and I'm not just saying this because I'm a Remmy Man.
Just go to their website and order a new catalog. 
"The People of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln

Offline MountainWalk

  • "Pa Nevermissashot"
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 3069
  • Location: Afognak, POW, Kodiak, Quilcene
  • High lead logger/ cutter
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2008, 05:03:17 PM »
im fine with remington. i just wish they would lay off the thumbhole stocks.. how ugly
The way that you wander, is the way that you choose
The day that you tarry, is the day that you lose

Offline bankwalker

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2495
  • Location: Matlock
Re: one more time...rifles narrowed down to 2
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2008, 05:29:32 PM »
thats what i planned on doing with the remington if i get it. im looking to get my new rifle as light as possible. i do alot of hiking when hunting and i just need a light wieght rifle.

Another option for light weight is the 84M Kimber Montana. The .308Win or .338 Federal would be an ideal mountain rifle and weigh in 5lbs (+/- a couple ounces) sans scope and rings.

I went this route with a .338 Federal and mine weighs in under 6lbs all up.



lol how funny. i just actually looked those up last night. and im ordering one next week.

its got everything i need and am looking for.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Define Wide by b23
[Today at 01:18:24 PM]


Special vs. Regular Pronghorn in WY by Ridgerunner
[Today at 01:02:32 PM]


Idaho deer 2026. Let’s go!! by TeacherMan
[Today at 12:57:12 PM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by Skillet
[Today at 12:55:30 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Face72
[Today at 12:25:28 PM]


Dodge trucks by b23
[Today at 12:25:20 PM]


EuroOptic by Webfoot
[Today at 11:20:32 AM]


It's now a buyer's market by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:15:20 AM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by RB
[Today at 10:57:48 AM]


Tikka 7prc by jrebel
[Today at 09:51:33 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by 2MANY
[Today at 08:45:01 AM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Today at 08:09:41 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 07:57:36 PM]


What decoy bag for Texas Rigged decoys is the best by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 07:44:39 PM]


Pack/ backpack to carry a folding long and edc etc.? by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 07:37:24 PM]


JES reboring experience by poor_choices
[Yesterday at 06:06:20 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal