collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: using illumanock in Wa  (Read 108477 times)

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6017
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #480 on: October 03, 2011, 09:03:48 PM »
Time to rename this thread Can-O-Worms.  I think we've heard every argument that should be heard more than once, and 10x as many that never should have been brought up.  Let it die.
Ya it is starting to sound like Obumbles and his Crew!

Sisu, that was a below the Obama  belt.... :chuckle:

Offline Lowedog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2625
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #481 on: October 03, 2011, 09:09:52 PM »
Time to rename this thread Can-O-Worms.  I think we've heard every argument that should be heard more than once, and 10x as many that never should have been brought up.  Let it die.
Ya it is starting to sound like Obumbles and his Crew!

Oh no not Obumbles!   :rolleyes:
"Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal."
— Aldo Leopold

Offline STIKNSTRINGBOW

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4366
  • Location: Chehalis
    • https://www.facebook.com/stiknstring.bow
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #482 on: October 04, 2011, 06:57:12 AM »
thats right ! you can keep your "Change"





i
The mountains are calling and I must go."
- John Muir
"I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order."
- John Burroughs
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor Trainer

Offline Lowedog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2625
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #483 on: October 04, 2011, 09:18:15 AM »
ughh...me fear change...change bad  :tung:

"Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal."
— Aldo Leopold

Offline BEARHUNTER1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: statup,wa.
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #484 on: October 05, 2011, 06:36:43 PM »
IF YOU DONT LIKE IT THEN DONT USE IT !!! BE PROUD OF WHAT YOU LIKE AND DO AND LEAVE OTHERS BE!!! BE LEGAL AND GOOD LUCK!!! :)

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8103
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #485 on: October 08, 2011, 05:28:09 PM »
i picked up some of the firefly nocks today (WA legal lighted nock) and they seem pretty cool, dont show up in normal day light. but show real well when shooting in lower light.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25034
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #486 on: October 09, 2011, 01:45:20 PM »
you got a www for that product BB? Couldn't find it on the web..
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14540
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #487 on: October 09, 2011, 01:52:34 PM »

Here SpecialT
I just looked at the Sterner Duttera Fire Fly glowing nocks and it is the answer for everyone!  :)

http://www.sternerduttera.com/store/firefly_glowing_nocks_stay_lit.asp

Offline Snapshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 721
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #488 on: October 13, 2011, 09:46:30 AM »
It's okay Rooselk, I really didn't think you had a reasonable explanation for that question anyway. I have read P&Y's rules of fair chase and if our seasons are regulated in compliance with their rules, why does Washington allow baiting? Or is this "being ridiculous" too?

Just to make it known to those who have not read them, Pope & Young's Rules of Fair Chase don't say anything whatsoever about baiting... ???

And if someone killed a helpless animal and stated as much on their P&Y entry form it would be denied inclusion in that record book.
I'd just like to remind everybody that it's about the hunting, not just the killing. In other words, it's about the total experience, the sport itself and the challenge involved. Bowhunting, done right, is a justifiable and honorable pursuit. Done for the wrong reasons, simply chalking up kills and seeking personal glory, it's taking away rather than giving back to a principled way of life that has to be experienced to be understood. G.StCharles

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44701
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #489 on: October 13, 2011, 09:48:19 AM »
It's okay Rooselk, I really didn't think you had a reasonable explanation for that question anyway. I have read P&Y's rules of fair chase and if our seasons are regulated in compliance with their rules, why does Washington allow baiting? Or is this "being ridiculous" too?

Just to make it known to those who have not read them, Pope & Young's Rules of Fair Chase don't say anything whatsoever about baiting... ???

According to the woman with whom I spoke at the Reg. 5 office, this is a loophole in the regs and may change soon.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #490 on: October 13, 2011, 09:52:46 AM »
How is it a "loophole"?
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #491 on: October 13, 2011, 09:56:27 AM »
It's okay Rooselk, I really didn't think you had a reasonable explanation for that question anyway. I have read P&Y's rules of fair chase and if our seasons are regulated in compliance with their rules, why does Washington allow baiting? Or is this "being ridiculous" too?

Just to make it known to those who have not read them, Pope & Young's Rules of Fair Chase don't say anything whatsoever about baiting... ???

And if someone killed a helpless animal and stated as much on their P&Y entry form it would be denied inclusion in that record book.
Are you saying that if someone stated they are baiting it would not be allowed inclusion in the Record Book?
If that is what you are saying it is absolutely not true.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44701
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #492 on: October 13, 2011, 10:15:51 AM »
How is it a "loophole"?

Don't know. That's what I was told. She may have been inserting a judgement or may have been parroting a Dept. attitude about baiting elk and deer. No idea.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #493 on: October 13, 2011, 10:28:51 AM »
How is it a "loophole"?

Don't know. That's what I was told. She may have been inserting a judgement or may have been parroting a Dept. attitude about baiting elk and deer. No idea.

I think that is the most likely scenario. I called about it 10 years ago and the individual I spoke to had a similar opinion/attitude. I am sure they will eventually do away with it. It seems they put it up for public input every year so someone is pushing hard to take it away.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: using illumanock in Wa
« Reply #494 on: October 13, 2011, 11:07:02 AM »
Baiting has nothing to do with Lumenoks. I can't believe some person who couldn't recover their deer is using their story to promote the Lumenok. We don't need the electronics and the game department chuckled when it was brought up at the last meeting. I had to mention how I was against them. Archers should focus on the ball - more seasons and opportunities for permits as opposed to gadgets.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by Brushbuster
[Today at 03:06:39 PM]


2025 Draw Results by TexasRed
[Today at 02:40:57 PM]


Boat registration by Bullkllr
[Today at 02:36:52 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by waoutdoorsman
[Today at 01:46:58 PM]


Mudflow Archery by MADMAX
[Today at 01:43:49 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Tree Killer
[Today at 01:40:51 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by 6haase6
[Today at 01:40:02 PM]


Rehome for GWP by Special T
[Today at 01:27:38 PM]


Vashon Island deer tag by Bob33
[Today at 01:20:05 PM]


Cowiche Cow Archery Tag - Group Hunt by VickGar
[Today at 12:45:06 PM]


Ritzville Rifle Buck - GMU 284 by Sundance
[Today at 12:37:11 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by finnman
[Today at 12:28:44 PM]


Oregon results posted. by finnman
[Today at 12:23:59 PM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by Hi-Liter
[Today at 12:06:37 PM]


Muzzy Mission Quality!!! by finnman
[Today at 11:54:18 AM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by throttlejocky20
[Today at 11:27:12 AM]


For the Vortex guys by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:23:45 AM]


Teanaway bull elk by throttlejocky20
[Today at 11:23:44 AM]


Palouse buck deer by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 11:09:55 AM]


2025 OILS! by HillHound
[Today at 10:25:46 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal