collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Change one regulation....  (Read 25256 times)

Offline DBake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 237
Change one regulation....
« on: April 23, 2008, 10:24:22 AM »
If you could change one muzzleloading regulation, what would it be?

If I would change one it would be to allow the use of jacketed and copper bullets.

Offline WDFW-SUX

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5724
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2008, 10:26:18 AM »
Make them hunt during modern season...... :chuckle:

Is that what you were looking for  ;)
THE WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SUCKS MORE THAN EVER..........

Offline robodad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 4437
  • Location: PA, WA.
    • frog4life !!
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2008, 10:36:27 AM »
How about an any bull statewide October 1-10 season.

JK !!

If I could change one thing it would be that the nipple does not have to be exposed to the elements (still no 209's only #11 or musket caps)
The essense of freedom is the proper limitation of government !!!

Offline DeKuma

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 2016
  • Location: Burlington, WA
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2008, 10:44:31 AM »
How about an any bull statewide October 1-10 season.

JK !!

If I could change one thing it would be that the nipple does not have to be exposed to the elements (still no 209's only #11 or musket caps)
I agree, but I would like to use 209's as well.
- Scott

Offline mossback91

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3195
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2008, 11:07:18 AM »
Take a little bit of season off of the bow season and add it to muzzle loader season. I think it should be primitive style like hawken style thats the onyl way to make it worth a while might as well use a rifel otherwise in my opinion. :dunno:

Offline rougheye

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1054
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2008, 11:19:24 AM »
 :bdid: :bs: :ass:

Offline groundhog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 563
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2008, 12:00:49 PM »
First off I shoot a traditional Muzzleloader but I have no problem with the Inlines. I even bought one but I just like my old traditional gun more.
I like the idea of allowing jacketed bullets. Jacketed bullets are not any more accurate and they do not allow a hunter to shoot farther. The advantage is that they do more damage on impact. Allowing Jacketed bullets would result in more retrieved game and fewer wounded animals.
A solid chunk of lead doesn't do the damage that a modern broadhead or high power rifle does. I have been involved in a bunch of Muzzleloader kills and animals just don't bleed like they do when shot with a bow or rifle.
It is hard to know where to draw the line on this stuff....

Sometimes I think technology is getting out of hand.....  I think the manufacturers better watch out or we could end up going back to Long bows and Flintlocks. Ya know, that might not be so bad........

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2008, 12:06:01 PM »
I think primitive should mean primitive.....I'll save my speech.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7026
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2008, 12:32:45 PM »
I think primitive should mean primitive.....I'll save my speech.

I agree.

Offline Gobble

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 2542
  • Location: Yelm, Wa
  • Wack'em and Stack'em
    • Dave Harder
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2008, 12:42:57 PM »
I agree too. I see these guys on the hunting shows with inlines jacketed bullets,scopes, 209s, etc and I think what the hell is the disadvantage or the challenge. I have 2 muzzleloaders a CVA hawken (.50 cal) I built from a kit and a Lyman Trade rifle (.54 cal) and have killed elk with both of them. The 385 gr slug dropped the cow I shot right in her tracks. I was able to retreive the slug and it retained 98% of it's weight and mushroomed to the dia. of a quarter (very devastating)

Offline Sagedawg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 657
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2008, 01:06:55 PM »
 I'd like to see a Muley buck unit opened over here on the Eastside. I dont mind shooting does at all, but I really want to hunt a nice muley buck during the rut. And just for bone Ill use my .45 Hawken style............ : ;)



    Sage


   

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2008, 01:37:50 PM »
Let them use the inlines and be protected from the elements. They're still limited range and can only do so much.  If the purists want primitive they're welcome to continue using primitive.

Offline Cougeyes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 867
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2008, 07:52:53 PM »
How about an any bull statewide October 1-10 season.
 

They did this once, dont think it was statewide but i know on the eastside around the Teanaway, Taneum, etc.... they did it.  We switched to muzzeloader that year, I missed a big 6 and ended up getting a 4 point with another guy.  That first day the butcher got 27 branched bulls brought into his shop.  Not sure what to think about that season, it was only for one season.  Dont know if they were trying to reduce the herd or what. It was a fun hunt though.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2008, 10:33:30 PM »
I like the idea of allowing jacketed bullets. Jacketed bullets are not any more accurate and they do not allow a hunter to shoot farther. The advantage is that they do more damage on impact. Allowing Jacketed bullets would result in more retrieved game and fewer wounded animals.

I don't agree. I wouldn't say a jacketed bullet does more damage on impact. That would depend on the particular bullet, I suppose. But just because a bullet is jacketed doesn't make it more lethal. The advantage would be in the higher velocity they can be loaded up to. I non-jacketed bullet is really maxed out at around not much more than 1500 to 1600 feet per second. When you get beyond that you get excessive fouling and a loss of accuracy. With a jacketed bullet you can load your muzzleloader up to the max, which is 150 grains with some of them, and really get them screaming. This DOES allow a gun to shoot farther, and DOES make a gun more accurate at longer ranges.

The line needs to be drawn somewhere and I think the WDFW has done a good job in balancing what is allowed and what isn't. If anything I think the restrictions should be even more. But I can live with the way it is now.

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: Change one regulation....
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2008, 10:44:36 PM »
Quote
Sometimes I think technology is getting out of hand.....  I think the manufacturers better watch out or we could end up going back to Long bows and Flintlocks. Ya know, that might not be so bad........

We're already there if you ask me. Longbows and flintlocks sound ok to me. Not against other types but they should be lumped in with general season in my book. That includes fancy 209s and compound bows.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:06:18 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:55:12 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Clearcut
[Today at 05:05:05 AM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by lazydrifter
[Today at 03:33:12 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:06:11 PM]


45 Winchester Magnum by poor_choices
[Yesterday at 07:01:02 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by JKEEN33
[Yesterday at 06:49:08 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 05:34:55 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:30:15 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by BLH69
[Yesterday at 08:58:57 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by mountainman
[Yesterday at 08:48:35 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal