collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW Commission March Proposals  (Read 4586 times)

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
WDFW Commission March Proposals
« on: January 19, 2011, 02:01:01 PM »
Quote
Dear Wildlife Enthusiast:
 

Draft regulations for 2011-12 game seasons and permits and the bald eagle protection rule are available for your review at http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/regulations/development.html. These proposals will be presented to the Fish and Wildlife Commission at their March 4-5, 2011 meeting in Spokane.  The Commission will consider adopting or amending these regulations at their April 8-9, 2011 meeting in Olympia.

If you would like the Department and Commission to consider your written comments regarding these recommendations, please submit them by February 9, 2011. 

Thank you for your interest in the management of wildlife in this state.  If you have any questions, please contact us at (360) 902-2515.


Sincerely,

 
Wildlife Program Customer Service

May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 02:14:46 PM »
Reading through that, right off the bat I see some good news:

Quote
WAC 232-28-286 2010, 2011, and 2012 Spring black bear seasons and regulations
Purpose of the proposal and its anticipated effects, including any changes in existing rules:
To expand the benefit of the spring seasons in northeastern Washington, the Department is recommending
increasing permit levels and season length. The anticipated effect is a slight increase in total harvest and
reduced bear nuisance activity.
For westside spring bear hunts, the Department is recommending increasing the season length in the Kapowsin
Tree Farm unit from April 15-May 15 to April 15-June 15 based on discussions with the landowners. There is a
slight anticipated increase to the number of hunter days.
Reasons supporting proposal:
The objectives for spring bear hunting seasons are to reduce timber damage by bears (western Washington),
reduce nuisance bear activity (northeastern Washington), and to divert harvest away from adult females and
toward adult males (southeastern Washington).

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2011, 02:18:42 PM »
Sounds like the 4 pt minimum is still on the table for whitetail in units 117 and 121:

Quote
WAC 232-28-351 2009-2011 Deer general seasons and definitions
Purpose of the proposal and its anticipated effects, including any changes in existing rules:
This is the third year of the 2009-11 hunting season “rule-package” and as such, few changes are recommended.
Changes during “off-years” are mainly to address crop and property damage problems; changes in population
levels due to environmental conditions or disease outbreaks; and to balance harvest levels with established
population objectives.
The major issue and purpose for recommending changes to the deer general season rules are to address the
white-tailed deer declines in northeast Washington caused by the harsh winters of 2008 and 2009. The
Commission is being asked to consider:
 Reducing the archery antlerless opportunity during the late season in northeast Washington to address
the decline and hasten population expansion;
 Retaining a four day youth, senior, and hunters with disability antlerless white-tail season in northeast
Washington to maintain some limited antlerless opportunity for these hunters; and
 Re-considering a four point white-tailed deer antler restriction for GMUs 117 and 121. The Steven’s
County Commissioners and the Steven’s County Fish and Wildlife Advisory Committee formally petitioned
the Fish and Wildlife Commission to adopt a four point antler restriction for GMUs 117 & 121. It is their
belief that an antler point restriction would hasten population expansion and improve the general health of
the deer population.
Reasons supporting proposal:
The proposal provides general season hunting opportunity for deer consistent with population and harvest
objectives while addressing property damage concerns.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2011, 02:35:54 PM »
I see they still have errors in there, carried forward from last year's reguations, one being that they show GMU 636 being open for "any buck" during the early archery season (it should be 2 pt minimum).

I will be sending my comments; my main question will be why the late muzzleloader deer season begins ON Thanksgiving, rather than the day before Thanksgiving, like the late elk muzzleloader, and the late deer AND elk archery seasons. It just doesn't make sense- it was always the day before Thanksgiving lilke the others, until these last three years when they changed it for no apparent reason.

Offline Kain

  • Scalpless
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5859
  • Location: Vantucky, WA
  • VantuckyKain
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2011, 03:21:56 PM »
WOW a whole month added onto some spring bear permits.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #5 on: January 19, 2011, 03:27:14 PM »
WOW a whole month added onto some spring bear permits.

Yep, and that's really got me thinking about applying for a NE permit now. I've got 6 points to burn. Might actually have a chance of drawing. They're adding two weeks to the beginning and 2 weeks to the end.

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #6 on: January 19, 2011, 03:46:11 PM »
Most of the Blues anterless Elk special tags took big hits.  Those of you who liked the Peola muzzy hunt, it's gonna get way tougher to pull that one.  Archery and Firearm numbers bounced around some.  Mostly up though.  They added a bunch of senior hunter Blues Elk permits.  Looks like the deer numbers stayed about the same.
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6367
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #7 on: January 19, 2011, 04:21:12 PM »
Wow big increase on the Toutle and Margaret bull tags.
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline Rainstorm Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 178
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #8 on: January 19, 2011, 04:59:02 PM »
Wow big increase on the Toutle and Margaret bull tags.
A big increase in the cow tags as well

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #9 on: January 19, 2011, 05:18:10 PM »
Maybe once they get the Toutle/Margaret elk numbers knocked down a bit, they will change those units over to a general season. Otherwise, why not just leave the excess elk for the wolves. ???

Offline WDFW Hates ME!!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1932
  • Location: SW Washington
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2011, 05:44:37 PM »
The whole st helens herd as a whole... Look at those proposed permit numbers.
Trying to wipe out the whole herd???

 :bdid:
*censored* happens when you party naked!!!

IBEW Local 125

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2011, 06:53:47 PM »
Looks that way- every permit in the St Helens area has been doubled or even quadrupled!   :o

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2011, 06:56:07 PM »
They (WDFW) are trying to balance their budget $6.50 at a time.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2011, 06:57:38 PM »
I don't know that the increase in antlerless elk permits will increase the number of applications purchased.   :dunno:

Don't remember where I heard it, but someone told me that it has to do with Weyerhaeuser and the lack of new logging there will be on their land in the area, and the subsequent lack of elk feed.

Offline WDFW Hates ME!!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1932
  • Location: SW Washington
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2011, 07:08:19 PM »
Or the wolf lovers want to blame the decline in the elk herd on the hunters instead of the wolves.

I believe if they keep those levels of cow permits there will not be much of a st helens herd left.

The worst permits in the whole proposal are the january 1-16th permits. Not hard to knock down a herd when they are the most vulnerable. A few permits are ok but the amount they are proposing is ludacris.
*censored* happens when you party naked!!!

IBEW Local 125

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16005
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2011, 07:11:19 PM »
Well maybe you should send an e-mail to the WDFW. Not saying it will cure all but atleast your voice is heard.
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2011, 02:44:38 PM »
 :bumpin:

Don't forget to  get your written comments in by February 9.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2011, 08:03:39 AM »
Bringing this to the top....

Tomorrow is the deadline for written comments on hunting regulation proposals for this year.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2011, 08:44:00 PM by bobcat »

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39180
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2011, 08:45:02 PM »
 :bumpin:

One more time.....

Offline jbeaumont21

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 871
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: WDFW Commission March Proposals
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2011, 09:42:33 PM »
"Increase bull permits in the Blue Mountains consistent with population objectives"
I thought that there weren't any elk in the blues? Looks like I am gonna have to put my points in the blues next year.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by finnman
[Today at 01:52:02 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by CP
[Today at 01:36:59 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by HighlandLofts
[Today at 12:01:17 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by GWP
[Today at 11:29:07 AM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:12:50 AM]


Oregon special tag info by JakeLand
[Today at 10:27:35 AM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:38:55 AM]


Get ready for the 4th of July by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 09:36:56 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 09:15:32 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:09:55 AM]


Idaho Mt goat draft plan by time2hunt
[Today at 07:59:04 AM]


Cougar Problems Toroda Creek Road Near Bodie by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:52:17 AM]


Disabled Fishing License by Blacklab
[Today at 07:44:43 AM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by jackelope
[Today at 07:18:59 AM]


Missoula Fishing by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:30:10 PM]


Buck age by borntoslay
[Yesterday at 11:08:41 PM]


Iceberg shrimp closed by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:55:37 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:36:21 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 07:28:59 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal