collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ridgefield refuge plan completed  (Read 1034 times)

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 122
Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« on: January 19, 2011, 05:06:12 PM »
  Did anybody see the North County News newspaper last night?  There was a brief article on the new 15 year plan. Sounds mostly disapointing with a touch of good.

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
I missed it. I went to a public input meeting but never got the results. What did the article say?

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 122
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2011, 05:24:41 AM »
 The article was real brief. The bad-- It basically said if and when they put in the new bridge we will lose 2 blinds. I believe it will be blinds  4 and 1. The check station would move to the little auto tour booth area and 2 replace the 2 blinds lost they were going to put 2 more in the Teal marsh. Which teal marsh is the little marsh right behind the check stand now. that would just screw the hunting up  for blind 12 and 15. That area doesn't need another blind let alone 2.

 Good they are gonna back off on the flooding to try to keep the ponds from getting to deep. and be more applealing to dabbling ducks and not spoonies and divers. They also talked about more crops. But i doubt they will be in the hunting area.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7042
  • Location: Mukilteo

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 08:25:55 PM »
That doesn't seem too bad. Though the refuge seems to be better at making plans then implementing them. I wonder how this plan would be different if the duskies where in better shape?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

If this is your trap by JakeLand
[Today at 04:26:02 PM]


Raffle ticket sales 2025 by trophyhunt
[Today at 03:57:41 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 03:55:08 PM]


The end? Bird bands. by hdshot
[Today at 03:44:43 PM]


WA Moose scouting by TriggerMike
[Today at 03:15:08 PM]


3 days for Kings by Tball77
[Today at 02:46:19 PM]


North Sea Fishing trip by BLH69
[Today at 02:05:14 PM]


2025 Crab! by BLH69
[Today at 02:02:40 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by birdshooter1189
[Today at 10:18:50 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 09:25:10 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by riflehunter
[Today at 08:03:26 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by CNELK
[Today at 07:31:32 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:01:45 AM]


Hunting bears in the thick stuff by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 09:23:26 PM]


Calling in August in Western Washington by J-Bone
[Yesterday at 06:44:50 PM]


How To Get Your $0.00 Tax Stamp - Black Hammer Arms by dreadi
[Yesterday at 06:39:00 PM]


Crabbing at cornet bay? by swanderek
[Yesterday at 06:32:44 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by bobcat
[Yesterday at 06:23:38 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal