collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ridgefield refuge plan completed  (Read 1029 times)

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 121
Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« on: January 19, 2011, 05:06:12 PM »
  Did anybody see the North County News newspaper last night?  There was a brief article on the new 15 year plan. Sounds mostly disapointing with a touch of good.

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
I missed it. I went to a public input meeting but never got the results. What did the article say?

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 121
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2011, 05:24:41 AM »
 The article was real brief. The bad-- It basically said if and when they put in the new bridge we will lose 2 blinds. I believe it will be blinds  4 and 1. The check station would move to the little auto tour booth area and 2 replace the 2 blinds lost they were going to put 2 more in the Teal marsh. Which teal marsh is the little marsh right behind the check stand now. that would just screw the hunting up  for blind 12 and 15. That area doesn't need another blind let alone 2.

 Good they are gonna back off on the flooding to try to keep the ponds from getting to deep. and be more applealing to dabbling ducks and not spoonies and divers. They also talked about more crops. But i doubt they will be in the hunting area.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 6999
  • Location: Mukilteo

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 08:25:55 PM »
That doesn't seem too bad. Though the refuge seems to be better at making plans then implementing them. I wonder how this plan would be different if the duskies where in better shape?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Drew Cleman Mountain Any Ram! by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:46:50 PM]


Swakane Ram by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 09:55:58 PM]


After a couple years of poor health,... by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 09:51:47 PM]


September mule deer velvet by jstone
[Yesterday at 08:43:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:54:48 PM]


Jim Horn's elk calling, instructional audio CD's. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:40:33 PM]


DR Brush Mower won't crank by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 05:03:05 PM]


Goose hunting with vice grips by Pegasus
[Yesterday at 04:51:23 PM]


Colockum Archery Bull Tag by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 04:40:38 PM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 04:12:47 PM]


Back up camera by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 11:54:30 AM]


Drew Quality by hunter399
[Yesterday at 11:12:45 AM]


Youth Cow Tag by Sundance
[Yesterday at 10:55:51 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by huntinluva
[Yesterday at 10:01:53 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 05:58:49 AM]


People on Cams by hunter399
[Yesterday at 05:56:38 AM]


Norway pass Elk by furbearer365
[Yesterday at 05:46:12 AM]


Norway Pass Bull by High Climber
[June 15, 2025, 09:23:10 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by IDWAHunt
[June 15, 2025, 07:54:08 PM]


Steel Targets??? by bowman
[June 15, 2025, 07:41:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal