collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ridgefield refuge plan completed  (Read 1106 times)

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 124
Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« on: January 19, 2011, 05:06:12 PM »
  Did anybody see the North County News newspaper last night?  There was a brief article on the new 15 year plan. Sounds mostly disapointing with a touch of good.

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
I missed it. I went to a public input meeting but never got the results. What did the article say?

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 124
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2011, 05:24:41 AM »
 The article was real brief. The bad-- It basically said if and when they put in the new bridge we will lose 2 blinds. I believe it will be blinds  4 and 1. The check station would move to the little auto tour booth area and 2 replace the 2 blinds lost they were going to put 2 more in the Teal marsh. Which teal marsh is the little marsh right behind the check stand now. that would just screw the hunting up  for blind 12 and 15. That area doesn't need another blind let alone 2.

 Good they are gonna back off on the flooding to try to keep the ponds from getting to deep. and be more applealing to dabbling ducks and not spoonies and divers. They also talked about more crops. But i doubt they will be in the hunting area.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7250
  • Location: Mukilteo

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 08:25:55 PM »
That doesn't seem too bad. Though the refuge seems to be better at making plans then implementing them. I wonder how this plan would be different if the duskies where in better shape?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by DonJuan
[Today at 02:24:21 PM]


Lion Down - the Savor of Success by DonJuan
[Today at 02:22:27 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by throttlejocky20
[Today at 02:22:16 PM]


The Rack by Pathfinder101
[Today at 01:37:15 PM]


Darwin Outfitters by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 12:22:38 PM]


Cleaning glass by Mtnwalker
[Today at 11:38:43 AM]


Degreasing A Deer Skull by eyesinfront
[Today at 09:47:06 AM]


Colockum WMA chukar hunting by Frostbite
[Today at 08:20:02 AM]


My Kansas 2025 Buck by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:03:32 AM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 06:58:46 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:35:09 AM]


Idaho's new Deer/Elk License System by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 09:54:33 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 08:46:41 PM]


Power bait secrets......send it by metlhead
[Yesterday at 07:26:47 PM]


Leopard Cur Pups by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 04:09:58 PM]


In the background by Ricochet
[Yesterday at 01:22:33 PM]


Midwest Whitetails by northwesthunter84
[Yesterday at 12:26:51 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal