collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ridgefield refuge plan completed  (Read 1027 times)

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 121
Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« on: January 19, 2011, 05:06:12 PM »
  Did anybody see the North County News newspaper last night?  There was a brief article on the new 15 year plan. Sounds mostly disapointing with a touch of good.

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
I missed it. I went to a public input meeting but never got the results. What did the article say?

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 121
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2011, 05:24:41 AM »
 The article was real brief. The bad-- It basically said if and when they put in the new bridge we will lose 2 blinds. I believe it will be blinds  4 and 1. The check station would move to the little auto tour booth area and 2 replace the 2 blinds lost they were going to put 2 more in the Teal marsh. Which teal marsh is the little marsh right behind the check stand now. that would just screw the hunting up  for blind 12 and 15. That area doesn't need another blind let alone 2.

 Good they are gonna back off on the flooding to try to keep the ponds from getting to deep. and be more applealing to dabbling ducks and not spoonies and divers. They also talked about more crops. But i doubt they will be in the hunting area.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 6999
  • Location: Mukilteo

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 08:25:55 PM »
That doesn't seem too bad. Though the refuge seems to be better at making plans then implementing them. I wonder how this plan would be different if the duskies where in better shape?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Norway pass Elk by Seabeckian
[Today at 12:02:11 AM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:50:13 PM]


People on Cams by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:55:59 PM]


Norway Pass Bull by High Climber
[Yesterday at 09:23:10 PM]


Drew Quality by blindluck
[Yesterday at 08:45:49 PM]


Greenriver quality Elk permit by IDWAHunt
[Yesterday at 07:54:08 PM]


Steel Targets??? by bowman
[Yesterday at 07:41:07 PM]


Is FS70 open? by CarbonHunter
[Yesterday at 06:08:08 PM]


Fun little Winchester 1890 project by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 04:24:08 PM]


Idaho unit 76 cow elk Oct 25 to Nov 15 by bornhunter
[Yesterday at 02:11:35 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:34:16 AM]


No trespassing, hunting, fishing signs posted along Skykomish river by jackelope
[Yesterday at 10:11:26 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 09:55:59 AM]


2025 OILS! by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 09:14:25 AM]


Looking for English Pointer pup (Elhew and/or Guard Rail lines) by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 07:22:10 AM]


Buying pheasants for training by trapp01
[June 14, 2025, 08:44:40 PM]


Mt. Spokane North Moose by Farmer72
[June 14, 2025, 08:12:24 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal