collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ridgefield refuge plan completed  (Read 1103 times)

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 124
Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« on: January 19, 2011, 05:06:12 PM »
  Did anybody see the North County News newspaper last night?  There was a brief article on the new 15 year plan. Sounds mostly disapointing with a touch of good.

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 05:56:38 PM »
I missed it. I went to a public input meeting but never got the results. What did the article say?

Offline goosegunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 124
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2011, 05:24:41 AM »
 The article was real brief. The bad-- It basically said if and when they put in the new bridge we will lose 2 blinds. I believe it will be blinds  4 and 1. The check station would move to the little auto tour booth area and 2 replace the 2 blinds lost they were going to put 2 more in the Teal marsh. Which teal marsh is the little marsh right behind the check stand now. that would just screw the hunting up  for blind 12 and 15. That area doesn't need another blind let alone 2.

 Good they are gonna back off on the flooding to try to keep the ponds from getting to deep. and be more applealing to dabbling ducks and not spoonies and divers. They also talked about more crops. But i doubt they will be in the hunting area.

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7247
  • Location: Mukilteo

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
Re: Ridgefield refuge plan completed
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2011, 08:25:55 PM »
That doesn't seem too bad. Though the refuge seems to be better at making plans then implementing them. I wonder how this plan would be different if the duskies where in better shape?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Long Range Steel Choke by Elmer Fletch
[Today at 06:10:11 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by storyteller
[Yesterday at 11:48:31 PM]


Smelt ? by Jake Dogfish
[Yesterday at 10:59:35 PM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:45:34 PM]


West side antler buyers by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:19:05 PM]


Is it a conflict of interest by bbarnes
[Yesterday at 08:54:11 PM]


Shotgun Sight help by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 08:38:11 PM]


Found after 2 days, meat worth anything? by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 07:58:12 PM]


Crazy looking Deer by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:35:14 PM]


6x51R by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 07:22:48 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by swordtine
[Yesterday at 07:20:45 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by 10thmountainarcher
[Yesterday at 07:16:08 PM]


Reinforcing stock for bipod by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 03:36:10 PM]


Seekins SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 01:42:40 PM]


Big J's Barn sale / Drawing by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 01:37:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 09:18:38 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:37:03 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal