Free: Contests & Raffles.
Every single thing about that story is disappointing... as is all the guys trying to justify it.
It was legal. If you guy's don't like it then don't do it. But you shouldn't judge him. If anything judge the timber company for allowing it.
Quote from: grundy53 on January 26, 2011, 01:59:41 PMIt was legal. If you guy's don't like it then don't do it. But you shouldn't judge him. If anything judge the timber company for allowing it.Nobody said it was illegal did they? Your correct that the Timber co. is responsible for allowing it.
Quote from: grundy53 on January 26, 2011, 01:59:41 PMIt was legal. If you guy's don't like it then don't do it. But you shouldn't judge him. If anything judge the timber company for allowing it.So is shooting a fawn off her mom's tit during a doe season. Would you do it?
If I was hungry enough I'd shoot a fawn right off the teat. I guess Im one of the dissapointing ones because if it was me I would have taken the deer also. I'd also have been happy with it enough to post. The only dissapointing thing is not supporting a hunter that was in all ways legal.