Deal reached to lift wolf protections in Montana and Idaho

[denali]

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_b91c763a-5196-11e0-8274-001cc4c002e0.html



Facing mounting pressure from Congress, wildlife advocates and the U.S. Department of Interior on Friday reached an agreement to lift gray wolf protections in Montana and Idaho and allow hunting of the predators to resume.

The settlement agreement — opposed by some environmentalists — is intended to resolve years of litigation that have shielded wolves in the Northern Rockies from hunting, even as the predator's population has sharply expanded.

Terms of the deal were to be filed in U.S. District Court in Montana. It would keep the species on the endangered list, at least temporarily, in four states where they are considered most vulnerable: Wyoming, Oregon, Washington and Utah. And it calls for a scientific panel to re-examine wolf recovery goals that set a minimum population level of 300 wolves in the region.

"For too long, wolf management in this country has been caught up in controversy and litigation instead of rooted in science, where it belongs," said Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes.

There are an estimated 1,651 wolves in the region following a costly but successful restoration effort. That program stirred deep antipathy toward the predators among western ranchers and hunters, who blame wolves for livestock attacks and a recent decline in some elk herds.

Court rulings blocked prior efforts by the Bush and Obama administrations to lift wolf protections.

But with Western lawmakers threatening to intervene, environmentalists said they wanted to pre-empt precedent-setting federal legislation on wolves. They fear congressional intervention could broadly undermine the Endangered Species Act.

The deal resulted from "a combination of the political pressure and trying to end the cycle of battling with the Fish and Wildlife Service," said Kieran Suckling of the Center for Biological Diversity.

Although wolf hunting in Idaho and Montana could begin as soon as this fall, the deal provides assurances to protect the species over the long term and even expand its range into other states, Suckling said.

Not all of the groups involved in wolf litigation agreed to the settlement, which will complicate efforts to garner approval from U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula.

Molloy's support is crucial because he must agree to put a stay on an order he issued last summer that reinstated wolf protections in Idaho and Montana.

Attorneys for Earthjustice previously represented most of the plaintiffs in the case. They withdrew this week citing "ethical obligations," but three of the four groups opposed to Friday's agreement already have brought on new attorneys.

"We're going to defend the judge's ruling," said Tom Woodbury with the Western Watersheds Project, referring to Molloy's 2010 order that reinstated protections for wolves in Idaho and Montana.

More than 1,300 wolves were tallied in Montana and Idaho in recent counts by state, federal and tribal biologists.

Only about 40 live in Oregon and Washington. But Suckling said the settlement agreement lays the groundwork for more wolves in those states and beyond by keeping them protected during their anticipated expansion.

"We need to start to build that second population, and this puts us on the road to get that done," he said.



More of the same as far as I'm concerned, Wyoming has a growing and expanding population of over 300 already?  

[saylean]

Wheres my wolf rug?!

Time to get some money to go buy a permit for Idaho.

[DOUBLELUNG]

To clarify: there are two separate legal proceedings here. 

The ARFs sued the USFWS for delisting wolves in Montana and Idaho.  Their settlement with the USFWS, to which some are opposed, would vacate their lawsuit and allow delisting in Montana and Idaho.  The impetus for them to withdraw their lawsuit is the actions taken by several federal representatives from western states to take ESA authority over wolves away from USFWS and give it to the states, which would undermine the ESA.

In a separate lawsuit, the state of Wyoming sued the USFWS for rejecting their state wolf management plan and not turning management over to the state.

I expect the first proceeding to delist wolves in MT and ID, and the second proceeding to delist wolves in Wyoming. 

[400out]

  But who has final say on numbers taken 

[DOUBLELUNG]

But who has final say on numbers taken 

Each state will, up to the required number of packs for delisting.

[grundy53]

But who has final say on numbers taken 

Each state will, up to the required number of packs for delisting.

I doubt it. these states don't want Wolves.

[NWBREW]

I hope it happens. Maybe bearpaw will start to offer wolf hunts. ............maybe not, I'm sure he has to deal with enough crap already.

But if he does......I'm in.  

[DOUBLELUNG]

But who has final say on numbers taken 

Each state will, up to the required number of packs for delisting.

I doubt it. these states don't want Wolves.

I don't think ID, MT and WY have any problem with having wolves, and are ok with the delisting requirements - provided they have uncontested state authority to manage them to any level they choose, down to the delisting minimums.

[grundy53]

But who has final say on numbers taken 

Each state will, up to the required number of packs for delisting.

I doubt it. these states don't want Wolves.

I don't think ID, MT and WY have any problem with having wolves, and are ok with the delisting requirements - provided they have uncontested state authority to manage them to any level they choose, down to the delisting minimums.

I think I misinterpreted what you said. I agree with you.

[Elkaholic daWg]

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,69816.0.html

[NWBREW]

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,73047.0/topicseen.html

[bearpaw]

I hope it happens. Maybe bearpaw will start to offer wolf hunts. ............maybe not, I'm sure he has to deal with enough crap already.

But if he does......I'm in.  

We do not have wolf packs in my current southern Idaho area. I think local ranchers are doing their civic duty for their own protection.
I still owe a local sheep herder a 6-Pack for taking out a lone wolf last summer that was killing his sheep. 

But, I have made an offer on another new area. If we get the area, we hope to offer some ultimate predator hunts:  Wolf/Cougar/Bear/Coyote 

We will also offer Wolf/Elk/Deer/Bear combos. Since there are both kinds of deer in the area, we will offer a 2nd deer at no addtional charge for anyone who kills a wolf. 

This is all provided we get the new area.



You guys need to check out this thread:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,73047.msg890847/topicseen.html#new

[dreamingbig]

Those wolf tags better be cheap and plentiful.  I hear they are pretty hard to track down.