Free: Contests & Raffles.
I do not like the new system, and I hate the way they draw names. They explained it to me on the phone but it was too confusing to understand. when people can draw tags with one point and one guy in this state has 26 points and doesn't get drawn there is something very wrong with the system. I have talked to Dave Ware about this and about the 10 or more point category. If we are going to keep this system which they will it produces too much money for them, then I love the Idea of a category that only lets people with 10 or more points apply. I even think areas that only have 10 or fewer tags should only be available to people with 8 or more points. I just wrong that us guys that have been waiting 16 years for certain tags get nothing while some lucky guy with 1 or 4 points gets the tag. I believe you should have to sacrifice some time to draw some of our very special tags, and a few of us have for far too long.
Quote from: Ridgerunner on April 01, 2011, 11:30:14 AMthey did reduce categories this year, in the OIL tags. I disagree with setting a certain number aside for guys with 10 or more points. Some of those high point guys may only apply for one unit, perhaps if they applied for 2,3, or 4 they would have drawn tags in the past. I've drawn what I consider to be 4 premium tags in this state in 15 years of applying and of those I got 1 first choice, 1 third choice and 2 fourth choices. Had I only put one choice down I would only have drawn one good hunt in 15 years. that's what some guys do and then they ***** about never drawing anything. I don't feel too sorry for those folks. I have been putting in for the two choices in quality,as much as I can and before the new system I was putting in for 3 of the 4 choices we had for elk. An example of what I was talking about earlier is, a guy I know drew the green river watershed elk hunt 2 years ago when they had 3 tags. The other two people with the elk tags had drawn with 1 and 4 points, he had 12. I don't believe they should have been able to put in for it so soon mostly because how they do the drawings is f'd up. There is too many examples of people drawing with very little points when guys have been waiting a 1/4 of their life for some of these tags. I had 14 points a couple years ago and didn't draw one of the 3 tags given out in the wenaha for elk muzzy, I'm not saying I should have been drawn. I'm saying someone that had close to my points or more should have been drawn before the people who did get drawn, they had 2,4,6 points. The way they draw is screwd, the odds that those 3 get drawn before any other of us with 10 or more points has got to be amazing. My point is the way they do the drawing doesn't make the point system work, if it worked you wouldn't see 3 tags go to people with 2,4 and 6 points when perhaps thousands of other numbers are going against their 4,16 and 36 names in the hat. Got to go for now, will bitch later.
they did reduce categories this year, in the OIL tags. I disagree with setting a certain number aside for guys with 10 or more points. Some of those high point guys may only apply for one unit, perhaps if they applied for 2,3, or 4 they would have drawn tags in the past. I've drawn what I consider to be 4 premium tags in this state in 15 years of applying and of those I got 1 first choice, 1 third choice and 2 fourth choices. Had I only put one choice down I would only have drawn one good hunt in 15 years. that's what some guys do and then they ***** about never drawing anything. I don't feel too sorry for those folks.
What's funny is Dave mentioned how all the extra money was being used for hunter access but he never went into any specifics. I think if they actually did something useful with the money, he would have talked about it. But he didn't. So I think the extra money was used to keep some of their employees working, who otherwise would have been without a job due to lack of funds.
Quote from: bobcat on April 01, 2011, 03:16:41 PMWhat's funny is Dave mentioned how all the extra money was being used for hunter access but he never went into any specifics. I think if they actually did something useful with the money, he would have talked about it. But he didn't. So I think the extra money was used to keep some of their employees working, who otherwise would have been without a job due to lack of funds.In that audio file, didn't DW say that they would discuss the hunter access later in the meeting? Or did I just hear him wrong?
The questions from the commissioners showed that they really are out of touch with what is actually going on and that the department can craft presentations to get anything passed.