Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: CP on April 28, 2011, 07:03:48 AMQuote from: addicted on April 28, 2011, 02:18:18 AMthey should set the minimum at 100 joules from the muzzle. Or they could just let us hunters use our common sense in selecting an appropriate weapon and not micro manage everything with legislation. our nation is neither educated enough nor does it have the common sense to perform most medial tasks without big brother. its sad.
Quote from: addicted on April 28, 2011, 02:18:18 AMthey should set the minimum at 100 joules from the muzzle. Or they could just let us hunters use our common sense in selecting an appropriate weapon and not micro manage everything with legislation.
they should set the minimum at 100 joules from the muzzle.
or they could just let us hunters use our common sense in selecting an appropriate weapon and not micro manage everything with legislation.
well they separate the ML requirements between deer and elk as far as minimum calibers..they could just as easy with handgun I have no problem with 357 Mag being the minimum for deer(I've taken deer no problem with 357,10mm,41 mag and 44 mag in other states)Elk, diffrent critter...41 mag at archery ranges,well placed shot and the right bullet would be pushing it in my mind in a revolvernow in say like the T/C encore or other single shot pistols that can handle high pressure rounds that opens up more cartridges to the task. Even then I would like a bullet 6.5cal or 7mm or bigger and a case size of at least the 308 winchester
our nation is neither educated enough nor does it have the common sense to perform most medial tasks without big brother. its sad.
Quoteour nation is neither educated enough nor does it have the common sense to perform most medial tasks without big brother. its sad.I always find it a bit funny when someone posts about people being uneducated, or unintelligent then has spelling/grammatical errors in their post. I think the word you were looking for is "menial" though.