Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: bobcat on Yesterday at 08:41:24 AMBy the way, I sure wish they would change the law so that eyeguards don't count in meeting the 3 point minimum for mule deer in this state. It defeats the purpose of the restriction. They're just allowing certain 2 point bucks that have the misfortune of growing eyeguards to be taken when they shouldn't be. If they're wanting to protect that age class of buck, then the minimum should be a true 3 point.
Quote from: 7mag. on May 22, 2011, 08:55:39 AMI think Bobcat nailed it.
I think Bobcat nailed it.
QuoteQuote from: bobcat on Yesterday at 08:41:24 AMBy the way, I sure wish they would change the law so that eyeguards don't count in meeting the 3 point minimum for mule deer in this state. It defeats the purpose of the restriction. They're just allowing certain 2 point bucks that have the misfortune of growing eyeguards to be taken when they shouldn't be. If they're wanting to protect that age class of buck, then the minimum should be a true 3 point.Quote from: Hunting Cowboy on May 22, 2011, 09:42:39 AMQuote from: 7mag. on May 22, 2011, 08:55:39 AMI think Bobcat nailed it. But if they change it then you'll have a bunch of big old 2 points running around breeding all the does. I like the ability to shoot the big 2 points with eyeguards from a management standpoint.
Kind of like debating whether you wipe your hiney from front to back or back to front. As long as your "three point" is legal I don't care what you call it.