collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook  (Read 2119 times)

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« on: May 27, 2011, 09:31:37 AM »
Article in today's Lewiston Tribune says a guy caught a 40" 36 lb chinook in the Clearwater.  They figure it would have been several pounds heavier if he hadn't kept fishing before getting it weighed.  He fought it for about a 1/2 hr and the filets weighed 14 lbs.
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline goosegetter79

  • YAR Member
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1624
  • Location: Bainville, MT
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2011, 10:44:22 AM »
Nice fish!!!! :drool:

Here's the link if anyone wants too see.



http://www.lmtribune.com/outdoors/
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" -Edmund Burke

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9635
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2011, 02:20:10 PM »
awesome :)

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2011, 12:30:18 PM »
That sure is a great fish for the Clearwater!  If it is 36lbs, the pic sure doesn't do it justice.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50320
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2011, 12:34:20 PM »
That sure is a great fish for the Clearwater!  If it is 36lbs, the pic sure doesn't do it justice.

I agree that fish doesn't look like 36# in the pic. It was weighed at the same place they weigh all the fish for the steelhead derby so I suspect it's a good weight, just a deceiving pic.
 :dunno:
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline fishcrazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1412
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2011, 08:13:35 PM »
I could buy 36#. You gotta remember springers run heavy compared to a fall fish. They have so much more fat and oil packed into them.

Kris
This family supported by UNION wages. Proud member of UA Local 26

Is the taste of the bait worth the sting of the hook twice?

Offline wildmanoutdoors

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 2459
  • Location: Port Orchard
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2011, 01:30:36 PM »
I could buy 36#. You gotta remember springers run heavy compared to a fall fish. They have so much more fat and oil packed into them.

Kris

Naw thats BS. Muscle weighs twice what fat weighs. Its just the pic....

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2011, 01:32:54 PM »
Outdoors writer for the Tribune just posted on his blog that a couple of guys caught a 40 incher and a 43 incher no weights.  If you know the river you should be able to figure out where they were using the picture.
http://www.lmtribune.com/blogs/2011/06/02/scrawl-of-the-wild/chinook-envy/
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline LndShrk

  • Cnut the Great
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 356
  • Location: Stanwood
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2011, 10:09:55 PM »
Pics are often not very good for weights...

Here is a 46# and 26#
They don't look much diff in the pics.

Offline turnloose

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 92
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2011, 10:15:41 PM »
up river bright = stinky king

Offline woodywsu

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 887
  • Location: Moses Lake
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2011, 10:04:37 AM »
I believe it. That guy catches some huge fish in the Clearwater. A couple years ago he caught a 29 lb steelhead up there. HUGE.

Offline fishcrazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1412
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Clearwater ID - 36 lb Chinook
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2011, 05:07:56 PM »
I could buy 36#. You gotta remember springers run heavy compared to a fall fish. They have so much more fat and oil packed into them.

Kris

Naw thats BS. Muscle weighs twice what fat weighs. Its just the pic....

I've hung  enough springers on scales and enough fall kings that I can tell you they are a few pounds more for the same size fish. the meat has more fat and oil and is just a denser meat than some fall fish that is going to be dead in a month.  ;)

kris
This family supported by UNION wages. Proud member of UA Local 26

Is the taste of the bait worth the sting of the hook twice?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Nevada bull hunt 2025 by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 03:20:09 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 01:32:20 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by highside74
[Today at 01:27:51 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by lonedave
[Today at 12:58:20 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:00:55 PM]


MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal