Free: Contests & Raffles.
Hunting-Washington does not condone the illegal killing of wolves or any other wildlife. An organized and civilized society must have laws and those laws must be enforced for a society to remain organized.It has been the policy of Hunting-Washington to allow most civil discussions. Moderators will sometimes remove comments they find and judge to violate forum rules especially if comments are unsuitable for family viewing or discussion on this forum. When comments are found that suggest illegal activity they are usually left on the forum so that law enforcement can monitor such activity. Everyone has agreed to the Forum Rules when signing up to use this forum. Please note the following excerpt from the Forum Rules:You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, slanderous, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law.
If you see a wolf shoot it, and don't tell. If you don't there won't be any deer or elk to hunt. I am not going to let some idiot politician destroy hunting for the future just to get some environmentalist vote. If you think I am over the top, I don't care. This is why Idaho is only selling half the non resident tags they did 5 years ago. I literally see 5% of the deer I saw 5 years ago. They kill everything. I used to see 150-200 deer a week in Idaho. This last year I saw 7 total, and heard a pack howling near our camp at night.If you don't shoot wolves illegally now, you will be shooting deer and elk illegally later, because they are on the fast track to becoming endangered if the packs get much bigger.
I would happen to guess this guy is a criminal. I say this because most criminals are caught because they animals of opportunity, not planners. If this guy had taken the time to really think about reducing wolves he would have done one of 2 things. 1 Done a little thinking about the most effective way of wiping out as many as these animals as possible. 2 Decided that the risk verses reward was worth staying legal. Shooting wolves is the least effective way to kill them off. Just think of a few articles that have been posted here... Legal hunting near Denali NP can only curb 3-6% of the population. Arial Gunning in ID in the Lolo area only killed 5 wolves...Professionals use their noodle and Plan a crime... This guy wasn't a professional.Criminal... walks into a liquor store and robs by shooting.Professional... In and out of a bank in 60 seconds with no shooting.Average crack head CriminalHollywood bandit, Movie The Town or point break, or Heat... ProfessionalsMost of the time when you weigh the risk verses reward you come out better staying legal... That is what this guy should have done...[/quot did you think that maybe that's because he isn't a criminal!!!!!
To the white family, I wish you all the best in court!!!
TWslayer... I don't have any problems with the fact that this guy whacked a wolf. Would i do it? no.. Your quote of me left me slightly confuesed... Do i think he is criminal? yes do i think he is like most other criminal that do not think thier crimes through? yes. Am i going to about it? not a drop.. From what i have heard it is pretty tough to catch poatchers, so if you get caught breaking the law that is the hardest to be caught at...
Ok, I'll keep my thoughts to myself. I wasn't trying to violate the websites policy. I just don't think the vast majority of people truly understand the massive devistation wolves are causing.