collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Hanford Bulls  (Read 135896 times)

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #330 on: October 12, 2011, 01:06:18 PM »
I just have a question??

ummm whats with the "apple"

are we so PC now we make up slanderous names using fruit :dunno: next thing you know someone might be calling someone else a banana  :yike: :yike:  or worse yet ...tomato.....

I guess I see all sorts of humor in being called fruit  :chuckle: :chuckle: I've been called way worse things than a peach ;)

Offline Austrian Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 4491
  • Location: Yakima, WA
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #331 on: October 12, 2011, 01:23:32 PM »
I just have a question??

ummm whats with the "apple"

are we so PC now we make up slanderous names using fruit :dunno: next thing you know someone might be calling someone else a banana  :yike: :yike:  or worse yet ...tomato.....

I guess I see all sorts of humor in being called fruit  :chuckle: :chuckle: I've been called way worse things than a peach ;)

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14559
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #332 on: October 12, 2011, 01:29:28 PM »
are we so PC now we make up slanderous names using fruit :dunno: next thing you know someone might be calling someone else a banana  :yike: :yike:  or worse yet ...tomato.....
Run, banana is a slanderous name that has been used for a while.

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50718
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #333 on: October 12, 2011, 01:43:26 PM »
I'm all done with the bashing that's going on in this thread. We can leave it up here but if the bashing one way or the other continues, I will lock it.
I will say one more thing....
1 link to the bashing won't be joining us any longer.
Thats it. Move on or I will lock it.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline hunterrcc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 486
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #334 on: October 12, 2011, 01:43:50 PM »
No I don't start fights with anyone never have, but I damn sure will finish one!!! If you know me personally I am a hard working, family man, honest, DIY hunter and proud american that doesn't take *censored* from people that have no respect for others or this country.  Which would include a lot more people then just Indians shooting elk.  From what Plat. says he is not one of the disrespectful indians shooting for the thrill!!! So as far as I can tell I have no reason to question his hunting ethics.   I have no problem with a sense of humor but come on shooting more then 1 big bull is no laughing matter!
 

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50718
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #335 on: October 12, 2011, 01:44:32 PM »
I'm all done with the bashing that's going on in this thread. We can leave it up here but if the bashing one way or the other continues, I will lock it.
I will say one more thing....
1 link to the bashing won't be joining us any longer.
Thats it. Move on or I will lock it.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline hunterrcc

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 486
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #336 on: October 12, 2011, 02:01:15 PM »
 :iamwithstupid:

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #337 on: October 12, 2011, 02:01:46 PM »
I am curious if sportsmen could buy the native hunting rights off them or just bribe them not to hunt.

 Trade them legalization of slot machines in exchange for their hunting/fishing rights, they can still hunt/fish like the rest of us so its not like they are giving up much. :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #338 on: October 12, 2011, 02:18:07 PM »
I think phool has something there.  I have been saying the same thing.  Lets do some trading.

I think legally the US would have to declare war on each tribe to void each treaty.  The USA could declare war but not do anything to them just make it a paper war.

 :dunno:
275 down 2

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50514
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #339 on: October 12, 2011, 02:31:25 PM »
I believe being a foriegn nationalist (or member of a soverign nation) entering a military reservation where something nuclear was being stored and discharging your firearm might constitute an act of war.  at least terrorism.......

Offline 724wd

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #340 on: October 12, 2011, 02:34:07 PM »
are we so PC now we make up slanderous names using fruit :dunno: next thing you know someone might be calling someone else a banana  :yike: :yike:  or worse yet ...tomato.....

shoot, my wife's a twinkie... yellow on the outside, white on the inside.  her parents are Laotian, but my wife was born in montana...  she's about as white as you can get!   :chuckle:

edit: i suppose banana would qualify, too, be we always use twinkie.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14559
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #341 on: October 12, 2011, 02:40:28 PM »
I think phool has something there.  I have been saying the same thing.  Lets do some trading.

I think legally the US would have to declare war on each tribe to void each treaty.  The USA could declare war but not do anything to them just make it a paper war.

 :dunno:

Or I think the tribe has to do something to break or ignore a rule in the treaty and it would cause the entire treaty to be void or have to be rewritten.

Offline ipkus

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 719
  • Location: Eastern
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #342 on: October 12, 2011, 02:41:10 PM »
I believe being a foriegn nationalist (or member of a soverign nation) entering a military reservation where something nuclear was being stored and discharging your firearm might constitute an act of war.  at least terrorism.......

I basically agree...so the question is...Has anyone with at least some first hand knowledge of what happened notified law enforcement?  I would have done it already, but don't have enough real information.

It would be ridiculous if someone knows for sure that this bull was shot on the reservation (Hanford) 5 days ago and hasn't tried to start the ball rolling.  If it is true, maybe they get away with it and maybe they don't, but we should at least TRY to make sure they get what they deserve.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50514
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #343 on: October 12, 2011, 03:12:06 PM »
Quote
Or I think the tribe has to do something to break or ignore a rule in the treaty and it would cause the entire treaty to be void or have to be rewritten

such as possessing alcohol on the reservation.

Offline igotbigbulls

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 369
  • Location: in the herd
Re: Hanford Bulls
« Reply #344 on: October 12, 2011, 03:23:21 PM »
it wasnt shot on the hanford reservation. close. but not on.
Always loved warm guts on a cold morning

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by brokentrail
[Today at 11:06:32 AM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by no.cen.wa
[Today at 11:00:20 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 10:50:59 AM]


Interview of Greg Jones about wolves by Humptulips
[Today at 10:44:44 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by mikey549
[Today at 10:23:03 AM]


Rabbit guts, feet heads for trapping bait by HighlandLofts
[Today at 10:18:53 AM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by HillHound
[Today at 09:33:15 AM]


As He Lay by ganghis
[Today at 09:28:02 AM]


Piebald blacktail fawn by highside74
[Today at 09:26:27 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by craigapphunt
[Today at 08:51:58 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by HntnFsh
[Today at 06:46:18 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Today at 06:17:35 AM]


Entiat Modern hunting by Lapua338
[Today at 06:09:20 AM]


Big buck, bad eye by 2MANY
[Today at 05:44:31 AM]


Cougar and an elk same pic/video by redi
[Yesterday at 08:52:46 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:48:21 PM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 06:19:07 PM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by bighorns2bushytails
[Yesterday at 03:41:51 PM]


Chasing wild chickens. by goldenhtr
[Yesterday at 02:53:31 PM]


Hunting w/ 30 rd magazine by jackelope
[Yesterday at 02:16:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal