Free: Contests & Raffles.
Because hunting with a rifle is not nearly as fun or challenging.
Some of us hunt late season and do absolutely no calling. Still hunting and spot and stalk. It is more fun to me to get within 30 yards of a buck or bull that has been chased for months by 3 different types of weapons hunters.
Here's a quick question.... There are a few posts that say 'with a rilfe the hunt is over when you find an animal, with a bow it begins' and 'liking the challenge of getting close, and PB's last post.Quote from: PolarBear on August 29, 2011, 10:31:08 AMSome of us hunt late season and do absolutely no calling. Still hunting and spot and stalk. It is more fun to me to get within 30 yards of a buck or bull that has been chased for months by 3 different types of weapons hunters.So for some of you is it that equipment forces you to make yourself get closer? Would you not try to get closer with a different weapon? Part of the reason I ask this is because I've read a few threads with bowhunters talking about all the animals they shoot at ranges of 60-80 yards, that's about the same range I've shot the majority of my animals with a rifle. So, would using a 12 gauge with 00 buck (range of 35 yds) be considered more 'challenging' than the bows? Are you trying to quantify challenge based on range at which an animal is shot?
Quote from: PolarBear on August 28, 2011, 09:07:06 PMBecause hunting with a rifle is not nearly as fun or challenging.Looks like Challange is the front runner? so calling in a bull or cow is more challenging then going rifle for the one spike that 2000 other hunters are going after as well? seems like the spike would be more challanging to me. Archery is the way to go for a better season.
Quote from: JimmyHoffa on August 29, 2011, 11:28:16 AMHere's a quick question.... There are a few posts that say 'with a rilfe the hunt is over when you find an animal, with a bow it begins' and 'liking the challenge of getting close, and PB's last post.Quote from: PolarBear on August 29, 2011, 10:31:08 AMSome of us hunt late season and do absolutely no calling. Still hunting and spot and stalk. It is more fun to me to get within 30 yards of a buck or bull that has been chased for months by 3 different types of weapons hunters.So for some of you is it that equipment forces you to make yourself get closer? Would you not try to get closer with a different weapon? Part of the reason I ask this is because I've read a few threads with bowhunters talking about all the animals they shoot at ranges of 60-80 yards, that's about the same range I've shot the majority of my animals with a rifle. So, would using a 12 gauge with 00 buck (range of 35 yds) be considered more 'challenging' than the bows? Are you trying to quantify challenge based on range at which an animal is shot?I hear you, I hunted with a 30/30 when I rifle hunted, when I first started bowhunting, I practiced at the range out to 80 yards, yet only shot game under 40.I now use a recurve, but 40 yards is 40 yards, no matter what weapon, especially here on the west side where it is hard to see that far sometimes... The challenge to me is not to get close, it is to stop my knees from shaking !