Free: Contests & Raffles.
Rem, What's gotten in to you lately? Every time I look at a thread with your posts, you are all pissed off and telling people how wrong they are. Oh, and you really don't need all this: ...........al;kdjflaksdj.........alk;jdflkaj; ???la;jdfklajsdl.......:LKJDLKFJDL:!!!!! jadl;kjfa;sldk>>>>>....... ??;LKJSDfl;kajsd..... to get your point across. Three periods indicate a pause, other than that one question mark or period will suffice.
ML & MF guys don't appreciate what it takes to get consistantly 40 yrds or less to an animal or have an animal in your site but just can't get close enough with a bow.
Welcome to resource allocation. All it did was pit hunters against eachother and reduce all of our opportunity to hunt as we choose.
I don't believe for one second that it's all about "dividing and conquering".
It's either "choose your weapon" or draw only. There has to be some limit on the number of hunters, and the number of animals harvested each year. I don't have a problem with our seasons. Although I would prefer a system more like Oregon's with more draw only seasons and less general seasons open to anybody and everybody.I don't believe for one second that it's all about "dividing and conquering".
I like the seperation between weapons due to less crowding in the woods though.
Quote from: seth30 on September 23, 2011, 08:33:19 AMI like the seperation between weapons due to less crowding in the woods though. Your kidding right? That is the BIGGEST complaint, even more so that the shortening of the seasons, is the over crowding from cramming everyone into fewer and fewer GMUs.
Quote from: bobcat on September 23, 2011, 08:25:05 AMI don't believe for one second that it's all about "dividing and conquering". After having gone to several 3 year season setting processes, the anti-hound agenda and watching the wolf agenda, I don't share your optomisim.