collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: High Altitude Ballistics  (Read 3947 times)

Offline BC CHASER

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 1393
  • Location: Sh!thole WA state
  • Si vis pacem para bellum
High Altitude Ballistics
« on: July 06, 2008, 02:46:53 PM »
How many of you have had a change in the travel of your bullets from your sight in spot to the high country?  I sight in at about 300 ft. and will be hunting at 7-8000 this year I believe it will change but how much?
WA.MT.UT.AZ.KS.NM.CO.AK.NZ.
Lion Pride founding member

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6046
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2008, 03:50:54 PM »
It will change some but not enough to be concerned unless your shooting longer ranges.
 As an example my .300WM, shooting at 500 yds., has 40" of drop at sea level and 37" of drop at 8000ft. above sea level.

Offline BC CHASER

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 1393
  • Location: Sh!thole WA state
  • Si vis pacem para bellum
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2008, 05:05:25 PM »
Thanks
WA.MT.UT.AZ.KS.NM.CO.AK.NZ.
Lion Pride founding member

Offline JoshT

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 738
  • Location: Sweeping the leg!
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2008, 01:47:40 PM »
If you're using turrets a good rule of thumb is about - 1/4 MOA per 2500' in elevation gain...

Example: If my correction for a 600 yard shot is +10 MOA at sea-level... then the correction at 5000' (where  most of my shots on bears occur) is +9.5 MOA.

If you're using a ballistic type reticule... then you probably won't notice much of a difference out to about any sane range. The only way to know is to climb up there and shoot a few rocks... empherical evidence trumps theoretical ballistic gak... contrary to the popular internet belief.
Strike Hard...
Strike Fast...
No Mercy, SIR!

Offline Intruder

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Spo-Vegas
Re: High Altitude Ballistics
« Reply #4 on: July 14, 2008, 02:52:08 PM »
It will change some but not enough to be concerned unless your shooting longer ranges.

+1....
Kinda depends on your cal/load too.  But more than likely it isn't a major factor of concern.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Mt. St. Helens Goat by trophyhunt
[Today at 02:08:20 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by andrebeergog
[Today at 01:23:44 PM]


Honor Mission - Billy Davis, 80, Navy Vet by pianoman9701
[Today at 01:06:44 PM]


Displaced Hunting Camps? by bhawley76
[Today at 12:33:12 PM]


WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind by Firstgenhunter
[Today at 12:19:50 PM]


Steaming Euro Mounts by Pathfinder101
[Today at 12:17:54 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by high_hunter
[Today at 12:06:36 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Turner89
[Today at 10:20:20 AM]


What happened to the Cowlitz by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:59:33 AM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by CJ1962
[Today at 08:40:15 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by kirkl
[Today at 07:11:10 AM]


Vortex scope by hookr88
[Today at 07:07:31 AM]


Turnbull elk hunt by getreal711
[Today at 05:24:02 AM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 07:56:31 PM]


SPIKE??? by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 07:53:00 PM]


Bugs and bones by jackelope
[Yesterday at 07:38:55 PM]


Mountain View archery elk. by High Climber
[Yesterday at 04:48:52 PM]


WWF influence on Inslee's final commission appointments by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 04:02:57 PM]


What's your favorite elk hunting cartridge? by Cougartail
[Yesterday at 03:25:46 PM]


Mill creek watershed by Hot Lunch
[Yesterday at 01:29:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal