Free: Contests & Raffles.
I say the treaties should be amended to say tribal members must abide by the WDFW regulations. Exceptions being: ceremonial harvest (marriage/birth/death - contact WDFW liasion to procure ceremonial tag) and the opportunity to kill additional animals for elderly family members unable to hunt themselves (with purchase of tag - perhaps at a reduced rate?).
Quote from: 724wd on November 01, 2011, 03:51:17 PMI say the treaties should be amended to say tribal members must abide by the WDFW regulations. Exceptions being: ceremonial harvest (marriage/birth/death - contact WDFW liasion to procure ceremonial tag) and the opportunity to kill additional animals for elderly family members unable to hunt themselves (with purchase of tag - perhaps at a reduced rate?). so what do the indians on this site think of this?
colock i agree with you on the point of just cuz it legal doesnt make it right. i am not yakama so i can not speak for them on what they do or dont do. i am not one who would advocate taking more than 1 BAB a year either. no point in it. IMOhunter 360are you saying that for hunting in our ceded area only or for on reservation rights too? you want WDFW to regulate the game on the reservation? or would you want us to give the reservation land back for all to hunt on also?
I was literally just typing this: "Glad to see we are all getting along on page 25 .... but this is the point where someone will derail the conversation yet again"Couldn't even finish typing it before it actually happened. So predictable