collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey  (Read 8420 times)

Offline Mr56Jeep

  • Jack of all trades
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 218
  • Location: Down Wind
Re: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2011, 04:25:24 PM »
yes when every dip*censored* in the world can place 5 spinners in a spread and kill birds.  they will get a lot of permanent rest.

Not sure what your point is?  You afraid someone else might kill more birds than you?

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9133
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2011, 05:05:45 PM »
yes when every dip*censored* in the world can place 5 spinners in a spread and kill birds.  they will get a lot of permanent rest.

Give those that want to, an option.  You don't have to use them.  What are you trying to say?  Permanent rest?  Canada and most states allow them.  Oregon and Washington don't allow them unless your hunting the reservations.  Just because you could use spinners doesn't mean they will always work.  Shakers and wave making decoys are nice.  The dog doesn't tangle in them like some jerk cords.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2011, 05:52:22 PM by h2ofowlr »
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Offline Mackerson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 47
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2011, 06:14:14 PM »
I think both sides make good arguments.  The motorized ducks work good but they aren't the best thing that I have ever used to lure weary ducks in.  After they banned the motorized ducks I started using snatch lines to make motion in the decoys and I think it was more effective.  I ran lines from the blind out under the water to something that i sunk that had a handle or eyelet on it and then ran the line up to the decoys.  When I would pull the line it would make the decoys dive like they were feeding.  It worked great and because the lines were sunk the dogs wouldn't get tangled in them.  The bottom line is that motorized decoys won't make you kill ducks, its all the other little details.  Just my  :twocents:

Offline goober

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 41
Re: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2011, 08:42:02 PM »
I've never used one, but i would. If they make them for geese, that would definitely help the spread.

Geese hate them!

Offline goober

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 41
Re: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2011, 08:57:15 PM »
You guys are missing one very important point. How many pull strings can you operate? One or two. How many electric spinners can you operate? AS MANY AS YOU WANT!. Do you think guys will stop at one, two or three? I've seen unreal numbers of spinners used in spreads in other states. While birds do get smarter, they still come to within 70/80 yds and we all know that there are plenty of guys that think that this is close enough for 3.5" shells. Do yourselves a favor and vote against them. we can always work on getting the magnets back in separate legislation, but you will regret the electric spinners.

DuckDr.Duke

  • Guest
Re: Battery-powered/Electronic Waterfowl DecoysExit this survey
« Reply #35 on: November 17, 2011, 11:12:30 AM »
I remember when they were legal. I watch some guys turn some northern mallards with them once and they just funnel into them it was awesome. Then the next year they were outlaw and I bought the Winduk, its pretty good. They should bring them back.  :twocents:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by jamesjett
[Today at 02:34:53 PM]


Moose in western washington? by Ridgeratt
[Today at 02:30:25 PM]


Looking for Red Hot Replacement Muzzleloader Nipple 2 SKU: M900013 by HntnFsh
[Today at 02:12:03 PM]


Diarrhea ? by Birdguy
[Today at 01:57:08 PM]


Idaho Non-res hunt draw by kodiak06
[Today at 12:06:59 PM]


Throwing a Hail Marry - Late Season Deer or Elk by Soady
[Today at 12:01:27 PM]


My wife found her first shed by jrebel
[Today at 11:27:09 AM]


Hunter bags 717 lb black bear by dilleytech
[Today at 08:25:09 AM]


Idaho Moose Tag Area 1-1 Hunt 3001 by MADMAX
[Today at 07:53:23 AM]


Ain’t it the truth!!😆😆😆😆 by wadu1
[Today at 07:40:28 AM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by hunter399
[Today at 06:13:12 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Craig
[Today at 05:43:48 AM]


Whos going out for late muzzy Elk? by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 10:33:49 PM]


Big J's Black Friday sale by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 08:05:28 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 07:54:28 PM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by Rufous
[Yesterday at 07:52:52 PM]


Willipa Hills Antlerless tag by b0bbyg
[Yesterday at 07:42:48 PM]


Seekins PH3 by HUNT JR
[Yesterday at 07:31:55 PM]


121 Quality November 20-24 by erronulvin
[Yesterday at 06:52:55 PM]


Skyline by Brute
[Yesterday at 06:51:45 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal