AWESOME 3pt min vs Spike only Aricle. PLEASE READ!!!!

[fair-chase]

Damn it Bobcat, 63 pages. I see my productivity slipping away. 



So far it's a good read. Thanks.

[Curly]

This is a good read on the history of elk in the Cascades:


http://www.nps.gov/mora/naturescience/upload/A%20History%20of%20Native%20Elk%20in%20Mount%20Rainier%20National%20Park.pdf

I don't have time to read it all, but I did see some interesting statements about indians on page 13 and 14

[colockumelk]

Bobcat excellant read.  And yep there went my free time.  But man that was really interesting. 

[slim9300]

This is a good read on the history of elk in the Cascades:


http://www.nps.gov/mora/naturescience/upload/A%20History%20of%20Native%20Elk%20in%20Mount%20Rainier%20National%20Park.pdf

I don't have time to read it all, but I did see some interesting statements about indians on page 13 and 14

Wait! Are they saying that the native Americans are not the "conservationists" who had no measurable impact on the land or wildlife prior to the evil white man, like I was taught in public school? =)

[Biggerhammer]

This is a good read on the history of elk in the Cascades:


http://www.nps.gov/mora/naturescience/upload/A%20History%20of%20Native%20Elk%20in%20Mount%20Rainier%20National%20Park.pdf

I don't have time to read it all, but I did see some interesting statements about indians on page 13 and 14

Wait! Are they saying that the native Americans are not the "conservationists" who had no measurable impact on the land or wildlife prior to the evil white man, like I was taught in public school? =)

Ha ha ha...

[colockumelk]

Must be more racist propoganda

[PlateauNDN]

Irregardless, at least this offers more insight/confirmation into elk being native to WA. to those non-believers that elk were not present here.  Thanks for sharing I'll have to read the whole report this weekend.

[STIKNSTRINGBOW]

This is a good read on the history of elk in the Cascades:


http://www.nps.gov/mora/naturescience/upload/A%20History%20of%20Native%20Elk%20in%20Mount%20Rainier%20National%20Park.pdf

Thank you for that, although I suspect it would cause quite a controversy among the "Native" readers, some of the comments from early explorers sound like what we get today on this forum. 

[PlateauNDN]

I've read through to pg. 22 and it's not causing any controversy here.   It sounds like history repeating itself all over again as we all know history tends to do that from time to time.

[STIKNSTRINGBOW]

Although it is kind of a 
That article deserves its own thread