Excellent initiative, Cedar. Thanks for the perspective, Killbilly. I understand both of your points of view.
I'm not so sure I agree about the commission, but I'm open KB. Considering what Cedar has said and what we've known all along about funding and rancher compensation, the fact that the commission voted in a plan without it being fully thought out indicates to me that some of them are willing to side with the wolf extremists without logical justification to do so. I also feel that if a candidate is on the staff of an organization that believes the adopted plan is a wonderful thing, (which they state on the front page of their site as a victory), he's not going to be a voice of reason in this or other predator issues, or even be a strong supporter of hunting. The only exception to that I can see would be if he were to resign from that organization because of a difference of philosophy about the wolves.