collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts  (Read 5610 times)

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45377
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2011, 05:03:32 PM »
Here is the response I got from the WDFW. It basically says they start paying attention to wolf reports when there are more than a couple from one area. You decide:

"Mr. W...,

The Director has asked that I respond to your recent e-mail regarding  gaining public assistance in conducting wolf counts similar to the concept applied with the Christmas Bird Counts.

 

Your idea is a good one. We are always looking to involve the public in assiting us in gathering wildlife information. This is  particularly true during these austere fiscal times where “citizen science” can help WDFW in gaining information that might other wise have been conducted by the employees we have lost during recent years. Unfortunately, the natural history of wolves does not lend itself well to the public survey concept employed in the Christmas Bird Count. Birds, for the most part, are highly visble and readily surveyed  to identify thier species and numbers. Wolves on the other hand, particuarly in the pioneering stage as they are in Washington, are highly secretive, avoid humans and are rarely seen. This changes a little bit once wolves begin pack formation and set up territories. At that time wolves are heard and more often seen. Our current protocol is record all credible wolf sighting and when we begin to get “clusters” of sighting we deploy remote cameras (trailcams). Once we begin to get visual comfirmation from trail cams we then trap the wolves in the area  and place radio telememtry caller on them. We then can determine their  territories, specific location and eventually the size of the pack. We have utilized citizen science in the deployment of trail cams and record the observation of hunters and others when they are in the bush. However, our experience. and those of other states, is that a broad survey for wolves prior to pack formation is not effective.

 

We do appreciate your interest. More information on our current packs status, wolf indentification, as well as mechanism for reporting wolf sightings can be found on our website http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/gray_wolf/.

 

Sincerely,

Rocky Beach

 

Richard J. (Rocky) Beach

Wildlife Diversity Division Manager

WDFW"
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline jager

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1238
Re: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2011, 05:19:12 PM »
Don't "we" already have clusters?
Sounds like a long time from the point of credible sightings through, and until collaring.
 :mor:

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45377
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WDFW Depending on Citizen Science to confirm bird counts
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2011, 06:30:22 PM »
Don't "we" already have clusters?
Sounds like a long time from the point of credible sightings through, and until collaring.
 :mor:

It does sound like a lot of confirming before reporting.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

49 degrees north late A moose by blakecarson70
[Today at 09:14:25 AM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by blakecarson70
[Today at 09:12:14 AM]


Grizzly? by ctwiggs1
[Today at 08:12:38 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:50:06 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 06:35:41 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by teanawayslayer
[Today at 01:24:21 AM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 10:55:36 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Pete112288
[Yesterday at 10:54:40 PM]


2025 Quality Tag Hunt. 💥VIDEO 💥 by DWAT
[Yesterday at 10:05:47 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Yesterday at 09:57:11 PM]


Lost Zoleo by N7XW
[Yesterday at 09:23:15 PM]


Panhandle whitetail dates by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 09:17:38 PM]


Any buck clarification by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:25:13 PM]


Saw 25+ does today. No bucks. Is blacktail rut over? by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 08:23:28 PM]


Surrounded by elk and this guy walks right up to me by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 08:13:15 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by muleyslayer#1
[Yesterday at 07:55:18 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by Rigby416
[Yesterday at 07:28:44 PM]


Idaho Unit 39 wolves by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 06:44:43 PM]


LINCOLN !! by cryder
[Yesterday at 06:33:14 PM]


Such cool looking animals by pashok23
[Yesterday at 04:07:56 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal