Free: Contests & Raffles.
I could see going to something similar to what Oregon does where they have Traditional only units. But that's going to upset everyone that has been hunting that unit before. Maybe we should take back the Indian Reservations and make those traditional only? But then the Indians could still raid and attack the camps! Doesn't get much more traditional than that!
QuoteI could see going to something similar to what Oregon does where they have Traditional only units. But that's going to upset everyone that has been hunting that unit before. Maybe we should take back the Indian Reservations and make those traditional only? But then the Indians could still raid and attack the camps! Doesn't get much more traditional than that! Now you're talking.
1. I could see going to something similar to what Oregon does where they have Traditional only units. But that's going to upset everyone that has been hunting that unit before. Maybe we should take back the Indian Reservations and make those traditional only? But then the Indians could still raid and attack the camps! Doesn't get much more traditional than that! 2. Most bowhunters are hunters and then archers, I consider myself an archer that also hunts. I don't think dividing the minority that we already are is good idea at all. It's one of the reasons I refuse to join or promote the WSB because they are so focused on traditional gear as opposed to compounds(stirring a hornet's nest here ). It is some what sad to see archery, which has long been considered a "traditional" method, so full of technology. But that is the way of life, some one is always making a better wheel(or cam ).
Quote from: funkster on July 12, 2007, 09:24:13 AMDid it ever occur to you that that leaves a 4% group of hunter's using primitive weapons. Stick with he subject.Did it ever occur to you that you were the one that got off the topic with your little FYI? Also you are not even thinking before you type. YOU said in your previous post that 96% of the hunters that tagged book bucks was with a compound.. Right?? not 96% of archers hunt with compounds.... Now your confusing yourself and thinking that the 4% that tagged book bucks with traditional is actually the percentage of people that hunt with traditional weapons. So take your own advice and stick to the subject so you don't confuse yourself. Thanks. I still think primitive should be spears not bows
Did it ever occur to you that that leaves a 4% group of hunter's using primitive weapons. Stick with he subject.
After reading all this here is my 3 cents. Archery no matter if you use compound, recurve, long bow it's STILL archery and it's STILL somewhat primitive. Archers have enough problems with the public image of hunting Bambi with out dividing us within our own ranks.Sisu
I have been hallering for year for a primitive muzzleloader season . Can't even buy real blackpowder in Yakima any more.Well just wait till OSHA get done with us . Well be hunting with sticks and stones . And then they will pass a law on them.Slenk
After reading everyones posts I would definetley support a primitive season, but I think that it should probably coincide with the season for compound bows but just open up certain units for the primitive guys that are usually closed during the general season.
Quote from: bowhuntin on July 12, 2007, 11:07:35 PMAfter reading everyones posts I would definetley support a primitive season, but I think that it should probably coincide with the season for compound bows but just open up certain units for the primitive guys that are usually closed during the general season.In Washington State??? don't think soThey already have those....
Be careful Slenk, there are even fewer primitive front stuffers as there are Trad bowmen. Here's Idabooner practicing with his homemade front stuffer.