collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?  (Read 16874 times)

Offline mallard79

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 777
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2011, 02:23:14 PM »
Barnes recommends 0.050 off the lands per their reloading manual.

Offline MuleDeerCrazy

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 374
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #16 on: December 20, 2011, 04:47:24 PM »
The Weatherby's seem to be so deep I can't get close to the lands anyway... guess I'll just go with the max. length in the Barnes book, although that will be different between the TTSX and the TSX given the difference of the tip.  Their max. was without the tip...?

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2011, 06:47:03 PM »
Seriously, load a few seated deep.....thank me later.

I know this works for a fact with one of my .300 Win Magnums. Loaded them to mag length. Then seated them deeper a little at a time untill the groups really started to tighten up to the point I couldnt ask anymore of a factory rifle and barrel but my .270 Winchester likes them way out there. I mean WAY OUT THERE!

From left to right:
3 .375 Ultra Magnums with 260gr Accubonds, .270 Win/140gr Accubond, .270 Win/140gr Barnes TTSX.


Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2011, 06:56:08 PM »
I can't tell for sure from the picture, but from the looks of it, the bullet isn't in far enough for the neck of the case to have a secure grip on it. I wouldn't trust it.

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2011, 07:14:26 PM »
I can't tell for sure from the picture, but from the looks of it, the bullet isn't in far enough for the neck of the case to have a secure grip on it. I wouldn't trust it.

Shoots like a dream, feeds from the mag box slicker than a snakes ass. I dont use the dinky thing on anything but yotes and chucks.  :tup:

My mistake, that's a 130gr Accubond, not a 140. I pulled my file for the rifle and took a pic of one of its last groups. I haven't shot the rifle since last year, not to shabby for a 299.00 factory Remington 700 ADL synthetic. ;) I've paid a truck load more for rifles to shoot as well.

« Last Edit: December 20, 2011, 07:30:14 PM by Biggerhammer »

Offline fremont

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 301
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #20 on: December 20, 2011, 08:17:10 PM »
Barnes recommends 0.050 off the lands per their reloading manual.

My recollection as well.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #21 on: December 20, 2011, 10:23:35 PM »
Bobcat, neck tension is enough to hold bullets firm in all but the most viscous recoil monsters. Cannurles are not necessary and seating to a groove on a tsx is equally unnecessary.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Barnes Bullet Reloaders - Seating Depth?
« Reply #22 on: December 20, 2011, 10:27:21 PM »
Bobcat, neck tension is enough to hold bullets firm in all but the most viscous recoil monsters. Cannurles are not necessary and seating to a groove on a tsx is equally unnecessary.


I realize that's normally the case but in that photo the bullet looks to be just barely inside the neck of the case. Maybe the bullet is longer than I think.


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Wolves behind Oak Creek by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 10:06:37 PM]


Idaho Fish and Game Commissioner charged with poaching multiple bull elk by Bob33
[Yesterday at 09:41:29 PM]


Holy Smokes what a shock!! by deerhuntr4885
[Yesterday at 09:03:09 PM]


Hound puppies $300 by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:49:45 PM]


Springer season getting close, who's going by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 08:18:13 PM]


Unable to get kids' hunter-ed certificates into WDFW system by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 05:51:41 PM]


Free Speech and standing up for WA hunters and Sportsmen by Firstgenhunter
[Yesterday at 03:26:13 PM]


Attention Sportsmen and Women: Presence needed at April WDFW Commission meeting by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 12:23:42 PM]


Anyone fish ocean out of Tokeland? by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 11:44:05 AM]


Elk camp upgrade/luxury item? by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 11:36:02 AM]


270 with 140 accubonds by jrebel
[Yesterday at 08:52:07 AM]


Small plastic boats? by DaNewb
[Yesterday at 08:39:09 AM]


2026 NE timberlands access by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 08:24:02 AM]


Salmon Unit Elk - Scouting Trip by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 03:26:00 AM]


ORM Timber Fund land by bullfisher
[Yesterday at 02:54:43 AM]


Montana Big Game Combo Draw chances by 257 Wby Mag
[March 26, 2026, 10:19:33 PM]


New Zealand in May by JBG
[March 26, 2026, 05:37:17 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal