Free: Contests & Raffles.
Anti's been buying licenses for a while now, that won't change much. I think the state should split. I'm stuck on the wetside but I can always dream about that paradise people refer to when they talk about the great "East Washington."
Break your study down to specific gmu's. You will see that there is a shift in harvest locations. I spoke to guys in the Joe that have killed elk for decades from the same camps and now they see few to none, yet right in cda there were gobs of elk. I know that Idaho as a state has lost a ton of money due to predation and they would not be so activly seeking ways to reduce the wolf population were it not harming the herd.
So in Idaho, elk has remained fairly constant overall, and the deer harvest has dropped a bit, but is still well withing historic ranges pre wolf. And anyone paying attention knows the deer in the Panhandle got knocked down pretty hard by the winters of 2007-08 and 2008-09 the same as in northeast Washington. My friends in that area tell me that deer are coming back now.So let 'er rip and try to explain to me how hunting really isn't as good as it used to be and how it's all because of the wolves. Because the fact is, the people who are pushing the BIG WOLF SCARE are people who have ulterior motives that include money, and power and influence. If you're going to give your money and time and support to organizations, at least have the facts and don't do it out of fear.
So in Idaho, elk has remained fairly constant overall, and the deer harvest has dropped a bit, but is still well withing historic ranges pre wolf. And anyone paying attention knows the deer in the Panhandle got knocked down pretty hard by the winters of 2007-08 and 2008-09 the same as in northeast Washington. My friends in that area tell me that deer are coming back now.
Quite obvious this individual hasnt spent much time in the wolf woods