Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: rasbo on December 28, 2011, 01:40:41 AMare thet finding carcasses?Or Something to validate that it is in fact wolves..This rancher had the first USFWS and WDFW confirmed wolf kill in Washington several years ago, wolves have been in GMU 105 (where their ranch is) for many years. But WDFW doesn't list them. Wolf pups were whelped in 2010, many people saw the pups in various areas. I have documented wolf sightings all over the unit including right where the ranchers cattle graze. I don't know if pups were raised in 2011, but there are so many sightings that many people think there is now 2 packs in GMU 105. No actual kills found of cattle yet, but numerous deer kills found in same areas where cattle are missing. One deer lkill this week right along the Kettle river was completely eaten overnight, so that explains how tough to find actual kills in that area will be with the heavy cover. Full grown bulls don't just disappear, I think the radio said 4 bulls are missing.
are thet finding carcasses?Or Something to validate that it is in fact wolves..
Quote from: HairTrigger on December 28, 2011, 05:41:43 AMI personally seen sign in yakima county in the tieton unit while helping my brother in law on his big horn sheep hunt. This picture is the size of my palm a lil bigger then my palmHairTrigger, I appreciate your input, but this looks like a cougar track. Did you get any other photos of possible wolf tracks?This link can help with wolf and cougar track identification: http://washingtonwolf.info/identification.html
I personally seen sign in yakima county in the tieton unit while helping my brother in law on his big horn sheep hunt. This picture is the size of my palm a lil bigger then my palm
Sometime it's easy to forget that the rancher should not have to prove wolves exist, to keep his cattle safe. It should be the responsibility of WDFW to do keep wolves out of their cattle, after all it's the government that told the people they would monitor wolves and take care of problems, unfortunately their (1) statewide trapper has not been able to do that.If I was a rancher I would feel like any wolf comes near my cattle is a dead wolf, unfortunately WDFW doesn't see it that way, look at the situation everywhere that livestock are being eaten by wolves: Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Minnesota, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Oregon, etc....As stated on the radio, the ranchers have picked up numerous wolf scat filled with cattle hair....
Quote from: bearpaw on December 28, 2011, 12:50:34 PMSometime it's easy to forget that the rancher should not have to prove wolves exist, to keep his cattle safe. It should be the responsibility of WDFW to do keep wolves out of their cattle, after all it's the government that told the people they would monitor wolves and take care of problems, unfortunately their (1) statewide trapper has not been able to do that.If I was a rancher I would feel like any wolf comes near my cattle is a dead wolf, unfortunately WDFW doesn't see it that way, look at the situation everywhere that livestock are being eaten by wolves: Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Minnesota, Wisconsin, New Mexico, Oregon, etc....As stated on the radio, the ranchers have picked up numerous wolf scat filled with cattle hair.... BP, the adopted States wolf plan (wolf disaster implementation and crammed down our throats plan as I refer to it) does not make any provisions for protection or reimbursement for losses of livestock. Correct?
It should be the responsibility of WDFW to do keep wolves out of their cattle, after all it's the government that told the people they would monitor wolves and take care of problems, unfortunately their (1) statewide trapper has not been able to do that.