Free: Contests & Raffles.
It is really disappointing to me that the administrators of this forum continue to allow posts like haugenna's above on this forum.
WhyQuote from: Wenatcheejay on December 31, 2011, 11:06:24 AMQuote from: Lowedog on December 31, 2011, 10:45:49 AMIt is really disappointing to me that the administrators of this forum continue to allow posts like haugenna's above on this forum.Honestly Lowedog, can't you appriciate how there is a stance that supports wolf management? People took the time to write and post Offical Government stances on wolf introduction. Do we really have to attack the site monitors here? Have you ever considered ignoring wolf threads? (Just a thought.) Why should I ignore wolf threads? I honestly don't see how what I said is attacking the site monitors. I have been a member of this site since the beginning and am very passionate about hunting. I feel I should be able to give my opinion as much as anyone else. I also support wolf management and feel like those types of post do nothing but undermine our chances of ever achieving the opportunity to ever manage wolves.
Quote from: Lowedog on December 31, 2011, 10:45:49 AMIt is really disappointing to me that the administrators of this forum continue to allow posts like haugenna's above on this forum.Honestly Lowedog, can't you appriciate how there is a stance that supports wolf management? People took the time to write and post Offical Government stances on wolf introduction. Do we really have to attack the site monitors here? Have you ever considered ignoring wolf threads? (Just a thought.)
I think most of these guys are just having fun joking around.But I hope none of these over-sensitive Washington people go to Idaho, the people are not joking around over there.People over there are shooting wolves year around and proud of it. But then they have been living with them for 15 years and have lost jobs and businesses due to wolves. I am pretty sure I remember the Idaho governor issuing a rule that IDFG could not respond to wolf shootings, the feds have to handle it. Is that right?Log back into this forum or any WA livestock website in 5 to 10 years, it will be interesting to see the comments after wolves further populate and start impacting more people and herds in this state.
Quote from: bearpaw on December 31, 2011, 10:36:24 PMI think most of these guys are just having fun joking around.But I hope none of these over-sensitive Washington people go to Idaho, the people are not joking around over there.People over there are shooting wolves year around and proud of it. But then they have been living with them for 15 years and have lost jobs and businesses due to wolves. I am pretty sure I remember the Idaho governor issuing a rule that IDFG could not respond to wolf shootings, the feds have to handle it. Is that right?Log back into this forum or any WA livestock website in 5 to 10 years, it will be interesting to see the comments after wolves further populate and start impacting more people and herds in this state. well said. So if some on this site say that s s s is poaching then I guess they would lump the gov of Idaho in with the poachers! He sent a notice in writing to the fed's and told them of his plan not to pursue any wolf kills in his state. This was at least a year or two ago, I wonder when it gets that bad here if the pro wolf guys will still think it was a good idea to allow them here. Or at least feel stupid about supporting the damn things.
Smoking is bad for you. Especially when you smoke more than a pack a day.
Quote from: trophyhunt on January 02, 2012, 03:31:12 PMQuote from: bearpaw on December 31, 2011, 10:36:24 PMI think most of these guys are just having fun joking around.But I hope none of these over-sensitive Washington people go to Idaho, the people are not joking around over there.People over there are shooting wolves year around and proud of it. But then they have been living with them for 15 years and have lost jobs and businesses due to wolves. I am pretty sure I remember the Idaho governor issuing a rule that IDFG could not respond to wolf shootings, the feds have to handle it. Is that right?Log back into this forum or any WA livestock website in 5 to 10 years, it will be interesting to see the comments after wolves further populate and start impacting more people and herds in this state. well said. So if some on this site say that s s s is poaching then I guess they would lump the gov of Idaho in with the poachers! He sent a notice in writing to the fed's and told them of his plan not to pursue any wolf kills in his state. This was at least a year or two ago, I wonder when it gets that bad here if the pro wolf guys will still think it was a good idea to allow them here. Or at least feel stupid about supporting the damn things. so any type of wolf shootings will remain illegal and considered poaching with full enforcement until there is a change in WA law.
Hard for me to understand why on a topic such as this the expression of true thoughts is forbidden, however the other side can torch business"s,release animals and god knows how many acts of extremism, and then advise the media that their group is responsible.And they are not held accountable. WHY NOT??Walking on eggshells is a tough task.