Free: Contests & Raffles.
I've had both the 20 and the 29, and the SF version is worth getting. The grip reduction doesn't look like much but it does make a big difference. The SF wasn't around when I had my Glocks, so I ended up selling both of them because they just didn't fit that well, which made it difficult for me to shoot them accurately. If you're a reloader, the Glock is pretty hard on your brass as well unless you put in an aftermarket barrel.There are other 10mm autos out there which I feel are better guns. The Dan Wesson CCBT was my favorite, but the Kimber Eclipse, EAA Witness, and Colt Delta Elite are all nice as well. There are options out there other than Glock, so be sure to look around.Andrew
You have goid points but the EEA Witness is not a better firearm than the Glock. The others you mention are surely nice but very spendy.
I've researched some of the others as well. It seems like a lot of people have had problems with the Kimber and Dan Wesson brought back the RZ 10 this year. I think they are both around $1200 to $1300. I do like the 1911 better just dont want to spend that much at this time.
If you're getting 41 mag ballistics from a 10mm, your loads are way to hot! With a 41 my I was getting 250gr bullets at 1250 from a 4" barrel. If you push a 10 mm that hard you're in big trouble!Andrew
Expensive to shoot.
Quote from: sled on January 06, 2012, 12:24:31 PM Expensive to shoot.I have a friend who has this exact gun and shoots .40s out of it when plinking and carries it loaded with 10mm's while in the woods.