Free: Contests & Raffles.
A true .338 WSM... not a .325.
A 25 WSM would be nice. Really no need for it though, as it wouldn't be much different than the 270 WSM.
Quote from: bobcat on January 15, 2012, 11:30:39 AMA 25 WSM would be nice. Really no need for it though, as it wouldn't be much different than the 270 WSM.They have a 25WSSM, I dont know if that interests you...
Quote from: Timberstalker on January 15, 2012, 11:39:09 AMQuote from: bobcat on January 15, 2012, 11:30:39 AMA 25 WSM would be nice. Really no need for it though, as it wouldn't be much different than the 270 WSM.They have a 25WSSM, I dont know if that interests you...Yes I know about that one. I like the full size case better. a 25 WSM should perform about the same as a 257 Weatherby I believe.
Quote from: bobcat on January 15, 2012, 12:37:56 PMQuote from: Timberstalker on January 15, 2012, 11:39:09 AMQuote from: bobcat on January 15, 2012, 11:30:39 AMA 25 WSM would be nice. Really no need for it though, as it wouldn't be much different than the 270 WSM.They have a 25WSSM, I dont know if that interests you...Yes I know about that one. I like the full size case better. a 25 WSM should perform about the same as a 257 Weatherby I believe.Not quite.
One of the first wildcat cartridges based on the .300 WSM case to surface is the .25 WSM. (Not to be confused with the factory loaded .25 WSSM.) The .25 WSM was created simply by necking down the short but very fat .300 WSM case to accept .257 inch bullets. Since it is not a standardized cartridge, there are no factory ballistics to compare, and no established pressure standards. At the same pressure established as SAAMI standard for the .270 WSM, the .25 WSM should be able to give a 120 grain bullet a MV of about 3200 fps and a 100 grain bullet a MV of about 3400-3500 fps. These velocities are about 200 fps better than the .25-06 and 100 fps less than the .257 Weatherby Magnum.