collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Live weight VS hanging weight  (Read 7052 times)

Offline Bigtime

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 13
Live weight VS hanging weight
« on: January 24, 2012, 01:13:59 AM »
I'm curious what everyones opinion is on the percentage of weight you need to ad back on to a bear after it is gutted to estimate a live weight.  Any info would be greatly appreciated

Offline JJB11B

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4496
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2012, 01:56:01 AM »
Why dont you weigh them before you kill em. Then they have all the blood and stuff in them. At least this way you wont have to do any of that stupid math stuff
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever."
Shane Falco

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8103
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2012, 08:37:46 AM »
Since bait was banned itnis very hard to get them to stand still on the scale to get an accurate live weight. Bring back baitingnso we can know live weight of our bears!

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44656
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2012, 08:55:42 AM »
Hanging weight is actual and live weight is the lies we tell our hunting buddies about the "1K lb bull, 10x10 that was so close I saw his sphincter clamp shut when I breathed".
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2012, 09:34:07 AM »
Generally as a rule of thumb you lose about 50 percent when you remove guts, hide, legs and head. That's with any animal. Deer, elk, pigs, bear, etc...

Example, if you put meat and skeleton on a hanging scale and your animal is 150 lbs. Then it was right around 300 live. Ish! :tup:
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline Rufous

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 523
  • Location: Arkansas
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2012, 10:47:26 AM »
A gutted bear would be about 85% of its live weight, or so I have heard.

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2012, 10:52:26 AM »
Ish, remove the head legs and hide and you have hanging weight, roughly 50%
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline deadyote

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 296
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2012, 12:22:25 AM »
I have heard the 50% thing for deer and bears before, but I have my questions about it.  Three years ago I shot a super old buck and the hanging weight was 187lbs.  That would make a 350+ lb mule deer?  Not sure about that one.  I just look at how much meat I get and that's enough for me.

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2012, 11:54:26 AM »
Wouldn't surprise me to see an old mature mule deer over 350 on the hoof. My buddy shot a whitetail this year that was 324 on the hoof. We weighed him whole on a slaughter truck that a rancher friend of mine had
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline deadyote

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 296
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2012, 04:10:30 PM »
I didn't think mule deer got that big, but I stand corrected!!  That old sucker was turned into all burger and peperoni.

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: Live weight VS hanging weight
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2012, 05:55:44 PM »
Haha I bet!
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Jetty Fishing by jackelope
[Today at 06:10:56 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by CarbonHunter
[Today at 05:19:54 PM]


Commercial crab pots going in today. by steeleywhopper
[Today at 03:26:22 PM]


where is everyone? by dagon
[Today at 01:23:20 PM]


Best gear shop? by Cylvertip
[Today at 01:01:14 PM]


New fisher looking to catch some pinks this year by freshgrease
[Today at 12:27:45 PM]


free fishing weekend but not all is included! PSA by birddogdad
[Today at 11:09:28 AM]


What is the VA Funding Fee and Its Purpose? by pianoman9701
[Today at 10:43:39 AM]


Looking for English Pointer pup (Elhew and/or Guard Rail lines) by Shannon
[Today at 08:11:19 AM]


Brittany breeders by Wingin it
[Yesterday at 10:31:28 PM]


Utah backdoor by baldopepper
[Yesterday at 08:24:45 PM]


Halibut fishing by hiway_99
[Yesterday at 08:17:27 PM]


1oz cannon balls by Angus
[Yesterday at 07:01:53 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal