collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: new proposals are out  (Read 34705 times)

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5204
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #105 on: February 06, 2012, 09:21:26 PM »
I see they are pushing the Archers further from the rut each year. Elk is starting on 4th and ends on 16. I believe in 2014 it's starts the 2nd of September.
For late season whitetail, added another day past peak. Went from November 24th to 25th each year.  :bdid:

I
could be wrong but I think the next year after the three mentioned will jump back to the 7th or 8th.   (Day after laborious day)
Next year the 3rd then2 nd then1st.......then 7th

Nope, they are proposing it always be the monday after labor which is the 2nd in 2014.  Absolute garbage. 

Labor day goes back to the 7th in 2015 so Elk season would start on the 8th just like in 2009. It starts the Tuesday after labor day which is on a Monday.

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2814
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #106 on: February 07, 2012, 05:25:39 AM »
2015 is not part of this 3 year season setting process.
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Online highside74

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 5204
  • Location: Eatonville wa
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #107 on: February 07, 2012, 06:44:27 AM »
2015 is not part of this 3 year season setting process.

I know.  I was pointing out that if they game comissiom was actually using the day after labor day as the start of elk, that it would go back to the 8th in 2015. Read the quote's.

Offline WAcoyotehunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4457
  • Location: Pend Oreille County
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #108 on: February 07, 2012, 07:44:30 AM »

Cougar seasons changed quite a bit.  September 1 - March 31 for most every unit with any legal weapon.  Each unit has a "harvest guideline."  It doesn't specifically say they will close seasons after harvest guidelines are achieved but the guidelines are at least established.  Interesting...


Big thanks to everybody who worked towards getting this season back where it needs to be.  :IBCOOL:

It's not quite where it needs to be...we need hounds back in the mix.

Offline fair-chase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 1618
  • Location: Tri-Cities WA
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #109 on: February 07, 2012, 01:30:18 PM »

Cougar seasons changed quite a bit.  September 1 - March 31 for most every unit with any legal weapon.  Each unit has a "harvest guideline."  It doesn't specifically say they will close seasons after harvest guidelines are achieved but the guidelines are at least established.  Interesting...

Big thanks to everybody who worked towards getting this season back where it needs to be.  :IBCOOL:

It's not quite where it needs to be...we need hounds back in the mix.

I agree, but that is a separate issue that needs to be addressed through the legislature and not through the WDFW. For boot hunters this is a huge leap compared to last years shortened weapon specific seasons.


Cougar Hunting
Another preposterous proposal is the new Harvest Guidelines. In Ferry, Stevens, and Pend Orielle counties we used to have about 120 cougar permits annually until hound hunting was closed in 1996 and we had a thriving cougar population. Now the WDFW is suggesting a harvest quota of about 1/3 those numbers, this is preposterous.

I also agree that the harvest guidelines fell a little short of expectations, but not as far as you are suggesting. Remember this is for boot hunters only. Hound hunting needs to be brought back but that is a separate issue that needs to be addressed in a different manner. Boot hunters can never be expected to make up for the harvest levels of hound hunters. That's just not a reasonable expectation. For the N.E. it appears that GMU 105 is the only one that fell significantly below harvest numbers.


GMU                   2010 COMBINED HARVEST TOTAL               PROPOSED QUOTA
101                                             8                                                  7-9
105                                             9                                                    2
108                                             4                                                  5-6
111                                             5                                                  5-6
113                                             4                                                  4-6
117                                             5                                                  6-8
121                                             5                                                  5-6
124                                             4                                                  7-9
130                                             1                                                  7-9
133                                             2                                              NO QUOTA
204                                             1                                                  6-8
« Last Edit: February 07, 2012, 01:38:04 PM by fair-chase »

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2814
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #110 on: February 08, 2012, 08:04:05 AM »
2015 is not part of this 3 year season setting process.

I know.  I was pointing out that if they game comissiom was actually using the day after labor day as the start of elk, that it would go back to the 8th in 2015. Read the quote's.

I understand you completely.  I was only pointing out that this package speaks to 2012, 2013, and 2014 only.  They could change gears again in 2015.  Heck they may start archery on Sep 1 again.
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #111 on: February 08, 2012, 08:10:27 AM »
The next "phase" is to give permits to what they take away....

Special tags for special seasons

or

Maybe a "spotlighting" permit? 

I'm with Carp on this one....I spotlight a fair amount of coyotes as they get pretty brazen around livestock at night.
how many cougs do you see spotlighting ?

Offline NoBark

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 565
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #112 on: February 08, 2012, 08:15:19 AM »
2015 is not part of this 3 year season setting process.

I know.  I was pointing out that if they game comissiom was actually using the day after labor day as the start of elk, that it would go back to the 8th in 2015. Read the quote's.

I understand you completely.  I was only pointing out that this package speaks to 2012, 2013, and 2014 only.  They could change gears again in 2015.  Heck they may start archery on Sep 1 again.


That is very true, but the point was, it's a calendar thing and not a plot to kill off archery hunting.   I hope they do change it in the mext three year term, but as of now expect it to be the 8th in 2015

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38504
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #113 on: February 08, 2012, 08:22:51 AM »

Cougar seasons changed quite a bit.  September 1 - March 31 for most every unit with any legal weapon.  Each unit has a "harvest guideline."  It doesn't specifically say they will close seasons after harvest guidelines are achieved but the guidelines are at least established.  Interesting...

Big thanks to everybody who worked towards getting this season back where it needs to be.  :IBCOOL:

It's not quite where it needs to be...we need hounds back in the mix.

I agree, but that is a separate issue that needs to be addressed through the legislature and not through the WDFW. For boot hunters this is a huge leap compared to last years shortened weapon specific seasons.


Cougar Hunting
Another preposterous proposal is the new Harvest Guidelines. In Ferry, Stevens, and Pend Orielle counties we used to have about 120 cougar permits annually until hound hunting was closed in 1996 and we had a thriving cougar population. Now the WDFW is suggesting a harvest quota of about 1/3 those numbers, this is preposterous.

I also agree that the harvest guidelines fell a little short of expectations, but not as far as you are suggesting. Remember this is for boot hunters only. Hound hunting needs to be brought back but that is a separate issue that needs to be addressed in a different manner. Boot hunters can never be expected to make up for the harvest levels of hound hunters. That's just not a reasonable expectation. For the N.E. it appears that GMU 105 is the only one that fell significantly below harvest numbers.


GMU                   2010 COMBINED HARVEST TOTAL               PROPOSED QUOTA
101                                             8                                                  7-9
105                                             9                                                    2
108                                             4                                                  5-6
111                                             5                                                  5-6
113                                             4                                                  4-6
117                                             5                                                  6-8
121                                             5                                                  5-6
124                                             4                                                  7-9
130                                             1                                                  7-9
133                                             2                                              NO QUOTA
204                                             1                                                  6-8


You are correct, we will have to change the law to get back additional hound hunting.

But in the meantime, why do we need these quota's. We have cougar showing up all over the place this winter due to so little hunting pressure. These numbers are all below what they should be in every GMU in NE WA. We have taken away almost all antlerless deer hunting and limited buck hunting in NE WA to try and help our deer herds.

Meanwhile wolves are moving into every GMU (photos are posted in the wolf board to prove this) and the WDFW refuses to manage cougar, bear, or coyotes. This is irresponsible management.....  :bash: :bash: :bash:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline ThePascoKid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 734
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #114 on: February 08, 2012, 08:43:12 AM »
If I'm reading it right it looks like they brought back early goose in eastern Washington , 2 day hunt with a 3 bird limit.
You old sailor you, you motor boatin' son of a bitch

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2814
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #115 on: February 08, 2012, 08:53:31 AM »
That is very true, but the point was, it's a calendar thing and not a plot to kill off archery hunting.   I hope they do change it in the mext three year term, but as of now expect it to be the 8th in 2015

I can't bring myself to trust them after everything else they have taken away.  Don't be surprised when it is different in 2015.  They ignored the voices of the WSAA and the WSB this year and chose not to adopt the 8-20th.  No reasoning behind it other than they don't want too.
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline NWWABOWHNTR

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2057
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #116 on: February 09, 2012, 08:00:14 AM »

Here is an excerpt of the letter and email sent by the Archery Coalition to Mr. Dave Ware and Jerry Nelson...

I am submitting this email to follow up on the letter from the Archery Coalition of Washington, as you are aware we are made up of board members from the WSAA, WSB and the TBW.  We have several issues we would like the Department to consider for improving the Bowhunters opportunities within our State. 

1.   Change the early elk season back to 8-21 Sept vice the starting date of the 1st
      Tuesday after Labor Day, and add our 1 day back that was taken away in 2009.

2.   Add more bowhunter opportunity in the late deer season within the 200 GMU’s, to
      alleviate over crowding within the Swakane GMU, preferably ALTA GMU 242.

3.   Add a late Archery elk hunt in the Quilomene for antlerless/spike.

4.   Change the early archery elk hunt in the Bumping GMU 356 from spike only to antlerless
       and spike, as calf recruitment is back at department goals.


"Don't argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44793
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #117 on: February 09, 2012, 09:21:11 AM »
My email to the Commission:

Dear Sirs/Madams,
 
With reference to:
WAC 232-12-063 Hunting at night--Regulations--Penalties

 
"...(c) Firearms are restricted to .22 caliber rifles and
handguns, and shotguns are restricted to no. 6 shot or smaller. Hunting with bow and arrow is allowed..."

This restriction basically says that law abiding citizens who are legally hunting game at night will be put at a disadvantage by being forced to use lower caliber firearms so it's easier for law enforcement to identify criminals. This is a bad proposal and should be scrapped. The reasoning for this has no basis in reality.
 
A poacher basically must be caught in the act of shooting an animal (or decoy) to be successfully prosecuted. Because it's not illegal to possess any caliber of loaded weapon at any time while in the woods, a law breaker must be caught doing the illegal deed. This makes it unnecessary to restrict the rest of us law-abiding citizens from being able to use a larger caliber firearm for legally hunting animals at night.
 
Please eliminate this restriction from the proposed game laws. Penalizing the legal hunters to make it easier to bust poachers makes no sense, especially when it really doesn't make it any easier to prosecute them.
 
Thanks for your attention to my request and comments.
 
Most Sincerely,
 
John W
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline NWWABOWHNTR

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2057
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #118 on: February 09, 2012, 10:13:21 AM »
Public comment period is through 21 Feb... Lets flood them with our comments in regards to the issues you have in this very important Season setting process.  If we do not then they will set the seasons for the next 3 ytears and we will have to live with it.  If you care about an issue... send the letters and emails!
"Don't argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience."

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2814
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: new proposals are out
« Reply #119 on: February 09, 2012, 10:42:37 AM »
Here are some of the email addresses to send them too:

Written comments may be e-mailed to wildthing@dfw.wa.gov

Phil Anderson: director@dfw.wa.gov

Dave Ware: david.ware@dfw.wa.gov

The commission's email: commission@dfw.wa.gov

Lets get those comments sent in!
« Last Edit: February 09, 2012, 01:24:54 PM by dreamingbig »
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by pianoman9701
[Today at 04:34:46 PM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Alan K
[Today at 03:46:09 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Today at 12:43:12 PM]


2025 Crab! by trophyhunt
[Today at 11:09:27 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:19:35 AM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:06:11 PM]


45 Winchester Magnum by poor_choices
[Yesterday at 07:01:02 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by JKEEN33
[Yesterday at 06:49:08 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 05:34:55 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal