collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1766 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7208
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21834
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Share your out of state experience by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 10:23:07 PM]


Weatherby Mark V Feeding Issue - Amateur Gunsmith Advice Needed by Reidus
[Yesterday at 09:59:59 PM]


Sturgeon Set-ups by supagoose
[Yesterday at 09:13:30 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:35:55 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by redi
[Yesterday at 08:34:06 PM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 07:51:17 PM]


Poll: Supreme Court will decide if 'habitual drug users' lose their gun rights by Tinmaniac
[Yesterday at 07:30:40 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by dc
[Yesterday at 07:14:10 PM]


E WA waterfowl guide by GWP
[Yesterday at 05:58:00 PM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by p-ohana
[Yesterday at 05:43:28 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by brew
[Yesterday at 05:02:07 PM]


Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 04:41:26 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 02:55:17 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 01:56:48 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 12:50:07 PM]


Disappearing ink. by bustedoldman
[Yesterday at 11:15:08 AM]


Possible record bull? by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 10:48:01 AM]


East Side by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 10:25:04 AM]


West side antler buyers by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 09:08:16 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:47:12 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal