collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1786 times)

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7224
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25063
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21860
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

What are you cooking? by EnglishSetter
[Today at 12:36:52 AM]


Shout out to bad-ss outdoor gear! by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 11:08:18 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 10:25:19 PM]


One of my Wowzhers by deer_hnter
[Yesterday at 09:48:58 PM]


Illinois, No Doubter by Birdguy
[Yesterday at 07:14:46 PM]


How to change email? by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 07:11:41 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 05:10:16 PM]


Canning Wild Game by Whitpirate
[Yesterday at 04:24:26 PM]


Big old and heavy by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 02:32:30 PM]


Pepper Jack tillimook by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 02:30:19 PM]


Thanksgiving duck hunt by metlhead
[Yesterday at 12:34:23 PM]


What boots? by fishngamereaper
[Yesterday at 10:46:03 AM]


One-Day Approval!!! by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 10:34:17 AM]


Wowzers by shotguunar
[Yesterday at 10:18:25 AM]


CWD test results 🤤🤫 by baldopepper
[Yesterday at 09:50:23 AM]


High n Dry gear by GWP
[Yesterday at 09:13:20 AM]


Hunting with a suppressor - dumb idea? by b23
[Yesterday at 09:01:46 AM]


Idaho/Montana elk/deer lodges by Hiker82
[Yesterday at 08:49:34 AM]


November 26,02025 Hunt by Delta Duckman
[Yesterday at 07:13:29 AM]


GMU 111 antlered moose advice request by teanawayslayer
[November 26, 2025, 10:20:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal