collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: electronic decoys  (Read 12515 times)

Offline tabler4113

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5
  • Location: wenatchee
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #30 on: February 23, 2012, 06:14:13 PM »
I honestly don't know what the big deal would be if electronics were legal. Washington is one of very few states that does not allow them at this point in time anyway. I really don't see what it would hurt. Personally I don't think I would spend the money on them. I use wind powered and jerk strings and do just fine. Three of my buddies and I would limit darn near every day out, and if not there was not much flying anyway. I'm all for it but just don't really see how it would really help my success.

Offline Sneaky

  • Savage
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 876
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #31 on: February 23, 2012, 08:01:06 PM »
 :yeah:

Don't need em, but it would be nice to have.

Tired of the state management that is backed by 0 science.

Offline full choke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2714
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #32 on: February 23, 2012, 08:29:01 PM »
My question is why do you want them? :dunno:

Everyone keeps saying they don't need them- then leave it at that. There would be more validity when the guys step up and say "I can't get it done. I need an annoying battery powered shiner to kill a duck."

Who cares if they use them in other states? Are you competing against those states for the same bird?

When they were legal- I had one. I used it. I thought it was pretty cool, made things pretty easy. Then they banned them and I was kind of pissed. I thought it was a typical WDFW kneejerk reaction to a situation. Now I am glad they aren't around. Nothing kills a pleasant morning in the marsh like some dude across the way with six to eight spinners running. Enjoy the fact they are not allowed.
"If you think our wars for oil are bad, wait until we are fighting for water..."

Offline Sneaky

  • Savage
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 876
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #33 on: February 24, 2012, 09:45:43 AM »
Having them opens up a lot of options as I stated earlier, deep water situations, not having to rely on wind, etc. Therefore you can hunt in places where you weren't normally able to set up. Its nice to have other options as competitive as the sport is today.

Offline 270Shooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3828
  • Location: Yakima
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #34 on: February 24, 2012, 09:53:53 AM »
They're legal on the rez and all they do is flare the ducks, movement on the water (ripples) is more effective anyways.

Offline DUCKDUDE

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 179
  • Location: Belfair, WA
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #35 on: February 24, 2012, 10:00:42 AM »
I get just as many birds without the help of electroics.  If you have a good spread, know how to call and when to call and are concelled you should be good without. :twocents:

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #36 on: February 24, 2012, 10:02:42 AM »
The only thing that flares ducks is bad decoy arrangement and poor calling, or stickin your mug out there to get a look at the bird. If used correctly motion decoys can be a great asset to bringin in shy birds. But whatever, I'll continue to kill birds the way I've been doing it.
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline DUCKDUDE

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 179
  • Location: Belfair, WA
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #37 on: February 24, 2012, 10:21:36 AM »
A good jerk cord is killer on those calm days.

Offline Fowlweather25

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1622
  • Location: Rochester, wa
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #38 on: February 24, 2012, 10:25:45 AM »
Jerk cords are great! Till your dog gets tangled in them.
What would life be without the thrill of the hunt?

Offline rtspring

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 5604
  • Location: Hermiston Oregon
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #39 on: February 24, 2012, 10:26:34 AM »
At the end of the day you get to kill seven ducks, I don't really see the big deal. Now if they start to change LIMITS I would be pissed off.
I kill elk and eat elk, when I'm not, I'm thinking about killing elk and eating elk.

It doesn't matter what you think...

The Whiners suck!!

Offline full choke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2714
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #40 on: February 24, 2012, 12:07:23 PM »
At the end of the day you get to kill seven ducks, I don't really see the big deal. Now if they start to change LIMITS I would be pissed off.

Not really. Limits are not set with the expectation that everybody will reach them. 7 birds would be way too high a number if they actually thought everybody out hunting was going to shoot that many. Look at the averages- it is something like .08 birds per hunter per day. Granted that takes in everybody- the guy who goes once, just walks around and doesn't even see a duck. Put him and the guy who limited together and you have a 3.5 bird average. If they expected everyone to limit we would have two or three bird limits.
"If you think our wars for oil are bad, wait until we are fighting for water..."

Offline hdshot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 834
  • Location: e wa
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #41 on: February 24, 2012, 01:54:39 PM »
At the end of the day you get to kill seven ducks, I don't really see the big deal. Now if they start to change LIMITS I would be pissed off.

Not really. Limits are not set with the expectation that everybody will reach them. 7 birds would be way too high a number if they actually thought everybody out hunting was going to shoot that many. Look at the averages- it is something like .08 birds per hunter per day. Granted that takes in everybody- the guy who goes once, just walks around and doesn't even see a duck. Put him and the guy who limited together and you have a 3.5 bird average. If they expected everyone to limit we would have two or three bird limits.

Setting limits main goal is to keep hunters in check on those good days.  Can never predict what the weather is going to do. Mother nature is the main factor that keeps numbers in line and hunting basically allows hunters claim them before she does.  Two main factors that put the hurt on numbers was market hunting and now habitat loss.  Not waving arms arguing over 4 vs 7 or 2 vs 5 and so on.  I have seen the clouds of non stop birds in the air with 3 as a limit and the population still dropped like a rock.
Don't read my post if facts hurt your feeling.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: electronic decoys
« Reply #42 on: February 25, 2012, 06:30:36 PM »
The majority of the waterfowlers on this site are hardcore.  The average waterfowl hunter does not do well.  The the 70% is the average joe/joelean hunter.  If they think they can scratch out a few more birds the 70% wants the electic decoys. 
275 down 2

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hoof Rot by MADMAX
[Today at 11:01:20 PM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by addicted1
[Today at 10:56:29 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by Sandberm
[Today at 08:18:08 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by JDArms1240
[Today at 08:16:36 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by addicted1
[Today at 06:47:44 PM]


A question for any FFL holders on here by ryan2202
[Today at 05:01:26 PM]


MA-10 Coho by CP
[Today at 04:14:05 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by BigGoonTuna
[Today at 01:29:55 PM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by addicted1
[Today at 12:10:11 PM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:01:04 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Skyvalhunter
[Today at 05:58:56 AM]


Stuffed Pork Chop by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 11:12:59 PM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by Remington Outdoors
[Yesterday at 09:43:57 PM]


Buck age by kentrek
[Yesterday at 08:56:47 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[Yesterday at 08:37:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal