So, I am intersted in taking some long range shooting classes. I have done a lot of research on BOTH courses. Talked to past students of both and they are equally comming with high recommendations. However, given all my research it has also caused me to have my doubts about certain things, despite what I have heard or read.
These are the two I am interested in so far:
http://thompsonlongrange.com/ - This system works exlusively with the Weatherby 300-378 Accumark and a custom Leupold scope with their proprietary reticle with hold points out to 1000K yards. They litterally hand the rifle new to you, teach and have you mount the scope and have it fitted to your feel and specifications on site.
Then, they teach you load teqniques and gather the data at their private range. ONLY changing the amount of charge to get a specific velocity that matches their fixed aiming points. ALL other aspects stay the same.. the brass, the bullet (they use ONLY a Nosler 180 Accubond) primer and Hodgon Powder. NO other substitions or bullet options are allowed.
Once the charge is obtained as well as MOA accuracy, you zero the rifle at 300 yards.
Day two, they teach how to gather air density readings and shoot at each aiming point. Finally ending you up at 1000K yards, which they GUARANTEE you will hit with thier system.
Interesting points:
They teach that overpower of scope can work against you - 14x is their max reticle
Windage is NOT something they push on. Estimation is important but knowing your size of your animal and waiting for wind lower than 20mph is what they push.
Elevation - changing elevation is compensated with dialing the scope. "air density" is emphasized MORE so than elevation as the owner told me that their are days that at 500 feet elevation the densitry can be similar to 4K feet
____________________________________________________
The other school is the "Best of the West" class in TX. I think we ALL know about this one if you turn on the outdoor channel and watch. So, I will not go too much into it. It is pretty basic stuff you have heard... Huskemaw scopes, turrets, KNOW your wind, Practice, Use Berger Bullets, etc.
_____________________________________________________
Where my questions come in:
1. Wind adjustments from EVERY book I have read or show I have seen on TV on sniping to long range shooting is HUGE out to 1K yards... there is no minimizing this variable.
2. Sucks that you MUST only commit to one bullet period. Not that I do not think the Accubond is fantastic do everything bullet, because I believe it can be. But, I like to have a few different loads.
3. I already have a 300 RUM custom with a Huskemaw 5-20 Blue Diamond Scope that shoots 210 Grain Bergers at under MOA. If I went to the Thompson course, I wold most likely sell it as I do not need a 300 RUM and a 300-378 Roy Weatherby.
4. That being all said, the simplicity of the system and the people I have talked too are all believers. There is also something really nice about have a fixed reticle scope and NOT having to dial up all the time.
Thoughts??? I know there are some HARDCORE long range guys here who can weigh in on both. Let me know your thoughts. Love to hear them!
So far, I am leaning towards the Thompson school, even though it is restrictive and sounds a little bit too good to be true on some aspects. If I do, I will be selling my 300 RUM custom which has the following: (If anyone is interested, please PM me)
*HS Precision Pro Series 2000 M24 Tactical Stock - Olive Drab with Pachmeyer Recoil Pad
*26" Hart #5 Stainless Steel Barrel with a Douglas Contour
*Badger Ordnance oversized Bolt Knob - OD Green
*Huskemaw 5-20 Blue Diamond Scope with Warn Rings and Bases w/Butler Creek Scope Covers
*Barrel Duracoated Matt Black
*Remington 700 Action Trued, Squared and fitted by Dan Cown Rifle Smith with Trinyte Finish
*RCBS Reloading and sizing dies