collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WA Wolves - more than estimated  (Read 3408 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
WA Wolves - more than estimated
« on: March 23, 2012, 11:23:58 PM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such

Offline steen

  • Women's Board
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 1789
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 08:34:07 AM »
Kinda like mice, if you see one there are a hundred you don't see.   :chuckle:

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2012, 08:37:13 AM »
u mean the government doesnt know about every single wolf here lol

Offline BAR C3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: Reardan, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2012, 08:45:23 AM »
The Spokesman Review had an article either yesterday or day before saying there was ten packs. Better add 5 to that if the game departement is reporting that.  :mgun:

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2012, 08:56:56 AM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such
There's a presentation for the commission that talks about wolves it's somewhere on this page.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/commission/meetings/2012/03/agenda_mar1012.html
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline Kain

  • Scalpless
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5859
  • Location: Vantucky, WA
  • VantuckyKain
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2012, 10:09:40 AM »
Thats about right.  Donny Martorello said cougar population estimate are really only about half of whats out there.  He siad they really have no way of knowing how many kittens and subadults are out there so they dont include them in the numbers.  Probably the same with wolves.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2012, 11:20:40 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45403
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2012, 11:23:12 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2012, 11:27:45 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.

 :yeah:    If it takes that long......all on Washingtons watch......

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Making memories by boneaddict
[Today at 06:17:16 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by jhouckwsu
[Today at 05:38:12 AM]


New scope or not? by BeerBugler
[Today at 05:24:11 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 04:26:58 AM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Threewolves
[Today at 04:01:56 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 11:58:20 PM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:17:51 PM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by Lapua338
[Yesterday at 09:46:32 PM]


Pouge unit help by Bone collector 13
[Yesterday at 08:57:11 PM]


Idaho unit 10A by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:44:27 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 08:32:50 PM]


Grizzly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:38:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM]


Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:13:04 PM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:27:11 PM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:16:30 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 05:53:47 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 05:29:34 PM]


cougar calling locations by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:06:42 PM]


121 Quality November 20-24 by ladder85
[Yesterday at 04:57:59 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal