collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40  (Read 8629 times)

Offline demontang

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3412
  • Location: Selah
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2012, 02:48:14 PM »
10mm is anasty round :tup:

Offline CastleRocker

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 1037
  • Location: Castle Rock, WA
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2012, 03:34:52 PM »
I have two model 22's.  Both generation 1 though.  I used to shoot IPSC a lot, and was a certified Glock Armorer for 8 years. 

I keep the box tops from the bullets and write the gun info in them and throw them into a box to keep track of how many rounds have gone down the pipe.  ALL rounds have been hard cast lead bullets.  I have never run jacketed bullets nor have I ever had a gun related malfunction with either one of them.  (I had a squib load with no powder, just a primer in it once).  Whoever told you guys not to run lead doesn't know what they are talking about.  One gun has between 12 and 13k rounds through it, the other has just over 18k.  (I just went and looked, and that box of bullets is over 3/4 full). 

I've never liked the way they feel.  I have always loved the way they shoot.  A malfunction in a match will put you in last place faster that a miss. 

I had ONE guy come to me at a match with an Armorer issue.  He had a broken striker.  He was just shy of 80k rounds through that gun. 

That is my personal experience with gen 1 Glock 22's.  I have no experience with any of the newer models.  I'm still trying to wear the first two out!
Work to live, don't live to work.

You can educate away ignorance, sober up drunkenness, but you can't fix stupid.

Offline Mark Brenckle

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 1585
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #17 on: March 21, 2012, 06:30:25 PM »
They may have one over at Norpoint that they'll rent you, that's how I decided on my XD-M.  I bought a couple boxes of ammo, paid the extra $5 and went through all the ones in the gun case. 

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50755
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #18 on: March 21, 2012, 08:29:31 PM »
I have a gen 3RTF G-22 and I love it. Comfy, always goes bang, eats whatever I feed it. I find it comfortable and like the way it looks too. It came down to choosing between the XD and the Glock. I went with the G22 because the XD's are too top heavy for me. I have big hands and don't see the need for the gen4 stuff but I can see how the backstraps and stuff might be nice for some.
With all that said I am contemplating a XDm .40 one of these days. My stepdad has one I might be able to get a good deal on.
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline 30.06

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 168
  • Location: Everett
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2012, 09:33:54 PM »
Personally I can't stand shooting .40 S&W. Glocks are great, they do point high for most people. 10mm is what I prefer. A forty has weak brass and can't be loaded up like other calibers. It was designed to replace light loads for the 10mm.
I am aware many LEO's carry this caliber, but I never would. It's usually easy to pick out the 40 cal shooter at the range, because they have their head way back. 9mm or .45acp are more comfortable to shoot, in my humble opinion.

Offline fish vacuum

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 2227
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2012, 12:05:55 AM »
Whoever told you guys not to run lead doesn't know what they are talking about. 

Isn't it the folks at Glock who say not to use non-jacketed bullets?

Offline 30.06

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 168
  • Location: Everett
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #21 on: March 22, 2012, 05:37:35 PM »
Polygonal rifling in a factory Glock barrel. Supposed to change it out with an aftermarket to shoot lead. Otherwise, lead coats it up inside, = higher pressure. There will never be a +p forty load, as it's not safe.

Offline GEARHEAD

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1783
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2012, 11:44:28 PM »
Glock 17 and 22, best fighting/carry guns ever made gen 1 thru 3. my 2 pennies :)

Offline marlin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 300
  • Location: olympia
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #23 on: March 24, 2012, 01:21:29 AM »
I havent had my Glock 20 for too long, only about 300rds thru it so far.. But I love it! I just hope I never have to fire it without earplugs! I thought my 2.5" barreled .380 was loud. The G20 might be the loudest pistol Ive shot besides maybe a .44mag revolver. You can tell its got some mean punch to it even with the bulk stuff.

Offline PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4878
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #24 on: March 24, 2012, 07:08:52 AM »
I have two model 22's.  Both generation 1 though.  I used to shoot IPSC a lot, and was a certified Glock Armorer for 8 years. 

I keep the box tops from the bullets and write the gun info in them and throw them into a box to keep track of how many rounds have gone down the pipe.  ALL rounds have been hard cast lead bullets.  I have never run jacketed bullets nor have I ever had a gun related malfunction with either one of them.  (I had a squib load with no powder, just a primer in it once).  Whoever told you guys not to run lead doesn't know what they are talking about.  One gun has between 12 and 13k rounds through it, the other has just over 18k.  (I just went and looked, and that box of bullets is over 3/4 full). 

I've never liked the way they feel.  I have always loved the way they shoot.  A malfunction in a match will put you in last place faster that a miss. 

I had ONE guy come to me at a match with an Armorer issue.  He had a broken striker.  He was just shy of 80k rounds through that gun. 

That is my personal experience with gen 1 Glock 22's.  I have no experience with any of the newer models.  I'm still trying to wear the first two out!
I have a glock 22 and love it. No hand loads or lead. It's called glock kaBOOMs. Here's a good link.
http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=1698.0

Offline Snopczynski

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 171
  • Location: Washington
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #25 on: March 24, 2012, 07:49:59 AM »
I had a gen 4 glock 17 and sold it because we couldn't get it to stop stove pipe jamming. Glock claims they had a bad run of too stiff dual rate springs in them. Every Glock I buy now is gen 3, and I haven't had a single issue. I have owned 4 gen 3 glocks since selling the gen 4.

Offline newred

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 62
  • Backcountry Hunter and Angler
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #26 on: March 24, 2012, 08:51:19 AM »
I have the 23 and love it a little more than 1000 rounds down range no hickups. I think it feels fine it is no custom 1911 but it is fine and I am accurate with it. People talk so much crap about the glocks when I have shot the FNs the XDs the sigmas and didn't see a huge difference in grip.

Offline 300rum

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2365
Re: Glock 22, Gen 4, .40
« Reply #27 on: March 24, 2012, 01:16:41 PM »
Nearly all the manufacturers tell you not to use reloads, ever!   

Uncle Mike's Holsters tell you not to holster a loaded pistol.   :chuckle:

I have reloaded thousands of lead and moly coated lead bullets in .40 .45 and 9 in Glocks in OEM barrels.  If you are worried though, just buy an aftermarket drop-in barrel for about $100 or so, no biggie.   

Whoever told you guys not to run lead doesn't know what they are talking about. 

Isn't it the folks at Glock who say not to use non-jacketed bullets?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by pianoman9701
[Today at 01:11:56 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by elkaholic123
[Today at 12:11:55 PM]


Pack Llamas vs Pack Goats by ghosthunter
[Today at 11:59:57 AM]


Coyote hunting with dogs by brokentrail
[Today at 11:04:42 AM]


Long Island Hunt by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 10:37:25 AM]


35 whelen by Henrydog
[Today at 10:34:20 AM]


Nice bachelor herd by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:46:46 AM]


Weatherby Long Range Steel Choke by Henrydog
[Today at 09:18:06 AM]


Four less by outdooraddict
[Today at 07:44:11 AM]


3 pintails by full choke
[Yesterday at 09:31:40 PM]


Report Wolf Sightings Here - Hunting-Washington Wolf Count 158+ by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:50:08 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 07:39:00 PM]


Building out duck boat by Wetwoodshunter
[Yesterday at 06:56:27 PM]


Banded bluebill by Mfowl
[Yesterday at 06:16:28 PM]


“Recreational trappers”? by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 12:56:37 PM]


Spicy garlic Elk Brats by Norman89
[Yesterday at 12:47:34 PM]


Elk bratwurst by Norman89
[Yesterday at 12:46:56 PM]


Elk breakfast sausage patty’s by Norman89
[Yesterday at 12:46:03 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by Tbar
[Yesterday at 10:47:00 AM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by C-Money
[Yesterday at 07:30:24 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal