collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WA Wolves - more than estimated  (Read 3215 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
WA Wolves - more than estimated
« on: March 23, 2012, 11:23:58 PM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such

Offline steen

  • Women's Board
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 1789
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 08:34:07 AM »
Kinda like mice, if you see one there are a hundred you don't see.   :chuckle:

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2012, 08:37:13 AM »
u mean the government doesnt know about every single wolf here lol

Offline BAR C3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: Reardan, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2012, 08:45:23 AM »
The Spokesman Review had an article either yesterday or day before saying there was ten packs. Better add 5 to that if the game departement is reporting that.  :mgun:

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2012, 08:56:56 AM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such
There's a presentation for the commission that talks about wolves it's somewhere on this page.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/commission/meetings/2012/03/agenda_mar1012.html
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline Kain

  • Scalpless
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5859
  • Location: Vantucky, WA
  • VantuckyKain
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2012, 10:09:40 AM »
Thats about right.  Donny Martorello said cougar population estimate are really only about half of whats out there.  He siad they really have no way of knowing how many kittens and subadults are out there so they dont include them in the numbers.  Probably the same with wolves.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2012, 11:20:40 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44765
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2012, 11:23:12 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2012, 11:27:45 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.

 :yeah:    If it takes that long......all on Washingtons watch......

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by RC
[Today at 03:11:57 PM]


GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by Dinkbears49
[Today at 02:50:23 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Stein
[Today at 02:23:22 PM]


Looking for people to hunt with. by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:21:22 PM]


Primer 157 vs 209 by EnglishSetter
[Today at 11:30:27 AM]


Evergreen youth livestock show and sale by nwwanderer
[Today at 11:06:58 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by ThunderRolls
[Today at 10:14:52 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by elkaholic123
[Today at 08:39:45 AM]


Rotator Cuff repair X 2 advice needed by Wood2Sawdust
[Today at 07:49:52 AM]


Upland Side by Side by OutHouse
[Today at 07:37:28 AM]


Tooth age on Quinault bull by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:54:44 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:45:13 PM]


3 days for Kings by Stein
[Yesterday at 06:45:11 PM]


Kinda fun LH rimfire rifle project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 06:44:33 PM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 05:22:46 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 02:19:48 PM]


Dandy Bull by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 01:29:37 PM]


Tricer AD tripod by gee_unit360
[Yesterday at 12:40:45 PM]


How a Product That Changed Hunting FOREVER was invented in the 1980's by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:28:44 AM]


Ten Years, and still plugging along by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 10:22:55 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal