collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WA Wolves - more than estimated  (Read 3459 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
WA Wolves - more than estimated
« on: March 23, 2012, 11:23:58 PM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such

Offline steen

  • Women's Board
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 1789
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 08:34:07 AM »
Kinda like mice, if you see one there are a hundred you don't see.   :chuckle:

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2012, 08:37:13 AM »
u mean the government doesnt know about every single wolf here lol

Offline BAR C3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: Reardan, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2012, 08:45:23 AM »
The Spokesman Review had an article either yesterday or day before saying there was ten packs. Better add 5 to that if the game departement is reporting that.  :mgun:

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2012, 08:56:56 AM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such
There's a presentation for the commission that talks about wolves it's somewhere on this page.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/commission/meetings/2012/03/agenda_mar1012.html
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline Kain

  • Scalpless
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5859
  • Location: Vantucky, WA
  • VantuckyKain
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2012, 10:09:40 AM »
Thats about right.  Donny Martorello said cougar population estimate are really only about half of whats out there.  He siad they really have no way of knowing how many kittens and subadults are out there so they dont include them in the numbers.  Probably the same with wolves.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2012, 11:20:40 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45537
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2012, 11:23:12 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2012, 11:27:45 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.

 :yeah:    If it takes that long......all on Washingtons watch......

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Your Idea of the perfect bull elk by huntnnw
[Today at 10:27:20 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Humptulips
[Today at 10:25:47 PM]


Searing prime rib by huntnnw
[Today at 10:24:57 PM]


Define Wide by builtfordtough
[Today at 10:22:00 PM]


Winchester SX3 problem by CNEDUX
[Today at 09:14:55 PM]


Winthrop wolves by KP-Skagit
[Today at 08:38:05 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Jpmiller
[Today at 06:28:33 PM]


Perfect 4 by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 06:14:20 PM]


35 whelen by Night goat
[Today at 05:41:23 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by Gooseassassin
[Today at 05:12:29 PM]


Learning his ducks by metlhead
[Today at 04:07:20 PM]


GSP Breeders- looking for GSP puppy by gallion_t
[Today at 02:41:10 PM]


Curvy Damascus Utility Fighter by A. Cole
[Today at 02:38:47 PM]


Big changes to skamania county boat launching by dilleytech
[Today at 01:44:52 PM]


“Recreational trappers”? by MADMAX
[Today at 01:44:47 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Today at 12:02:52 PM]


Nice bachelor herd by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:06:25 AM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 08:18:03 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal